Close Please enter your Username and Password

My Blog

Welcome to my blog!

Democrats can’t stand Trump’s successes – So it’s time to impeach
Posted:Dec 13, 2019 12:45 pm
Last Updated:Dec 13, 2019 12:51 pm
20 Views

Apologies to Elton John, but in Washington and throughout so much of the country, can you feel the hate tonight?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was asked reporter James Rosen if she hates President Trump. She responded with an “if looks could ” fire in her eyes and denounced Rosen for his question while claiming she doesn’t hate Trump.
Former Vice President Joe Biden verbally attacked and challenged an 83-year-old man in Iowa to a push-up contest at a gathering of Democrats. The man asked about Biden’s and how he managed to get a lucrative job with a Ukraine company while lacking any experience in the field. Biden called him a “damn liar.”

George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley testified before the House Judiciary Committee that although he didn’t vote for President Trump and is not a Trump supporter, he doesn’t believe the president has committed impeachable offenses. For his honesty, “My home and office were inundated with threatening messages and demands that I be fired from George Washington University.”

While some blame President Trump for the rhetorical escalation, that is too simple an explanation. I think the real problem for Democrats in general and the far left, which dominates the party, in particular, is that the president is winning. He has stolen success from failed Democratic policies, and the only response Democrats have is impeachment. They must destroy his presidency or their own destruction.

Consider the most recent jobs report and the stock market reaction. CNBC summarized the good news:

— “Nonfarm payrolls surged 266,000 in November, better than the 187,000 expected economists polled Dow Jones.”

— “The unemployment ticked down to 3.5 percent from 3.6 percent, back to the 20 low and matching the lowest jobless since 69.”

— “The end of the GM strike had a big effect, boosting employment in motor vehicles and parts 41,0, part of an overall 54,000 gain in manufacturing.”

— “Average hourly earnings rose 3.1 percent from a year ago, slightly above the 3 percent expected economists polled Dow Jones.”

The Dow Jones Industrial Average soared 337 points in response.

African-American and Hispanic unemployment are at record lows. Could the result be more support for the president and other Republicans from African-Americans and Hispanics in the 2020 election? Three recent polls — Emerson, Marist and Rasmussen — show the president at percent approval or higher among black voters. As candidate Trump said during the 20 campaign, African-Americans have been voting for Democrats for decades and what have Democrats done for them? He urged them to try someone else, namely him.

This is what scares and angers Democrats. If they lose significant numbers of black voters, they’re toast. Democrats have taken the black vote for granted. They have talked a good game but failed to deliver with jobs and better education opportunities — such as school choice.

If the hatred seems bad now — and it is — imagine what it will be like should President Trump have the opportunity to name another justice to the Supreme Court. It will make the hatred directed at Brett Kavanaugh seem tame.

Government has become a god to the left. If they aren’t controlling it, they become out of control. If they aren’t addicting more people to government, they are losing them, as those who have been dependent on government become more independent and self-reliant.

Cal Thomas
1 comment
The Real Leaders of the Coup
Posted:Dec 12, 2019 7:08 am
Last Updated:Dec 13, 2019 2:12 pm
133 Views

This is nothing but speculation but that seems to be the new normal in today's political climate. I believe that the coup of the executive branch of our government is being led and orchestrated a of Democrat Congresspeople. Specifically Nancy Pelosi and Jerry Nadler as the leaders. As I stated right at the start, this is pure speculation,, but after hearing Nadler's goofy remarks regarding the need to impeach the President, stating "We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems" as if to imply we the American People are not intelligent enough to select who we want in the Presidency. I think that remark should anger all Americans. To insult the intelligence of 63 million Americans that they are , is enough to make this little piss ant Nadler sent back to what ever rock he crawled out from. The threat to our elections is quite evident as it is coming from within the halls of congress.

In the first century B.C. Roman statesman Marcus Cicero once opined, “It is the peculiar quality of a fool to perceive the faults of others and to forget his own.” Were he not separated from the current Congress two-thousand years, Cicero could very well be describing today’s Democrats and their hypocritical impeachment narrative. Call it stupidity or whatever you like but Pelosi, Nadler and the rest of the House Democrats have openly committed the very acts they would like to remove the president from office. They are fools that cannot see in themselves the flaws that they project on others.
13 Comments
Democrats Trying to Change the Constitution
Posted:Dec 10, 2019 10:49 am
Last Updated:Dec 11, 2019 3:02 pm
153 Views

The jig is up. The Democrats have now actually admitted—in writing—that their sad little attempt at impeachment is entirely baseless. The House Judiciary Committee Report was released Saturday and admitted very critical points:

First, the Democrats are trying change the standard of impeachment. They are literally changing the rules fit their theatrical story. Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler wrote in the preface that the previous reports on grounds for impeachable offenses in the Nixon and Clinton eras “remain useful points of reference, but no longer reflect the best available learning on questioning relating to presidential impeachment.”

Why, Jerry? Because you have no evidence for legitimate grounds of impeachment? This only proves that President Trump indeed does not belong in the ranks of Nixon and Clinton, where there was actually evidence of impeachable offenses.

Second, the Democrats are proceeding with impeachment against President Trump not because of any past wrongdoing which they have no proof of, but to “save the Nation” from Trump remaining in office. That is not a constitutionally permissible reason to impeach. That’s why we have elections. The American people get to decide who remains in office, absent clear evidence of impeachable offenses actually committed. We don’t impeach or convict based on a vague fear for democracy from the opposition party.

The Report, however, claims that impeachment exists, “not to inflict punishment for past wrongdoing, but rather to save the Nation from misconduct that endangers democracy and the rule of law.” This is not the standard for any legal proceeding in any context in the United States. We do not bring charges (even articles of impeachment) or convict based on the possibility of a future threat “to democracy” or otherwise.

The Democrats are totally failing. They have no evidence that genuinely qualifies as an impeachable offense and are now trying desperately to aggregate a lot of nothing (even going back to the dead Mueller Report) to try to force their end game of impeaching President Trump simply because they don’t want him to be re-elected. Please, they are saying, don’t be sidetracked with facts and evidence and law and standards.

But this is precisely why America is not a nation of rulers but of the rule of law. The Democrats are trying to be the very tyrants they pretend they are fighting against. They are trying to manipulate our supreme law of the land and subvert the will of the American people who voted Donald Trump into office. Thank God we are in fact a constitutional republic and have standards of law in this country!

If Schiff and Nadler’s circus continues and the Democrats are successful in lowering the standard of impeachment to merely desiring to oust the sitting president of an opposition party, why bother even having elections? But make no mistake—that is actually the Democrats’ long game. They want to overthrow the American Constitution and our rule of law. They want to be tyrants. They want all the power and will stop at nothing to get it. At every turn, they simply change the rules when they don’t want to by the rules.

That’s not America. Regardless of one’s political party and perspective on policy, this is now much, much bigger than that. This is a constitutional crisis. This is the very core of our American government and civil society. For everyone who loves freedom and liberty for ourselves and our families, this transparent impeachment scam is the only reason we need never vote Democrat again. The Democrats gave us that reason in writing.

By Jenna Ellis
11 Comments
Bill Barr Indicts 8 Including Mueller Top Witness for Funneling Millions in Foreign Donations
Posted:Dec 8, 2019 7:28 pm
Last Updated:Dec 12, 2019 1:01 pm
245 Views

Bill Barr on Friday indicted individuals for illegally funneling foreign Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton and several Democratic senators.

The list of the Dem organizations taking this illegal is astounding – almost every Dem state organization and many super PAC’s including the big Priorities USA.
All of the leading names in the Democratic party took in this including Adam Schiff and Ted Lieu, Jon Tester, Cory Booker, Hillary Clinton, etc.

Currently, Nader is in federal custody on other charges.

This is being covered up by the liberal mainstream media! As we reported previously– George Nader, a Lebanese-American businessman and of Mueller’s ‘star witnesses’ was charged in a Virginia federal court in July with additional crimes.

Recall, Nader was previously indicted on June 3rd 2019 on pornography charges.

According a 3-count indictment unsealed Friday, Nader was charged earlier in July for possessing pornography and for traveling with a minor engage in illegal sexual acts.

Nader is accused of transporting a -year-old European the United States for in the year 2000.

The DOJ reported:

Earlier today, an indictment was unsealed against the CEO of an online payment processing company, and others, charging them with conspiring make and conceal conduit and excessive campaign contributions, and related offenses, during the U.S. presidential election in 20 and thereafter.

Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and Assistant Director in Charge Timothy R. Slater of the FBI’s Washington Field Office made the announcement.

A federal grand jury in the District of Columbia indicted Ahmad “Andy” Khawaja, 48, of Los Angeles, California, on Nov. 7, 2019, along with George Nader, Roy Boulos, Rudy Dekermenjian, Mohammad “Moe” Diab, Rani El-Saadi, Stevan Hill and Thayne Whipple. The 53 count indictment charges Khawaja with counts of conspiracy, counts of making conduit contributions, counts of causing excessive contributions, counts of making false statements, counts of causing false records be filed, and count of obstruction of a federal grand jury investigation. Nader is charged with conspiring with Khawaja make conduit campaign contributions, and related offenses. Boulos, Dekermenjian, Diab, El-Saadi, Hill, and Whipple are charged with conspiring with Khawaja and each other make conduit campaign contributions and conceal excessive contributions, and related offenses.

According the indictment, from March 20 through January 20, Khawaja conspired with Nader conceal the source of more than $3.5 million in campaign contributions, directed political committees associated with a candidate for President of the United States in the 20 election. By design, these contributions appeared be in the names of Khawaja, his wife, and his company. In reality, they allegedly were funded by Nader. Khawaja and Nader allegedly made these contributions in an effort gain influence with -level political figures, including the candidate. As Khawaja and Nader arranged these payments, Nader allegedly reported an official from a foreign government about his efforts gain influence.

The indictment also alleges that, from March 20 through 20, Khawaja conspired with Boulos, Dekermenjian, Diab, El-Saadi, Hill, and Whipple conceal Khawaja’s excessive contributions, which totaled more than $1.8 million, to various political committees. Among other things, these contributions allegedly allowed Khawaja to host a private fundraiser for a presidential candidate in 20 and a private fundraising dinner for an elected official in 20.

The indictment further alleges that, from June 2019 through July 2019, Khawaja obstructed a grand jury investigation of this matter in the District of Columbia. Knowing that a witness had been called testify before the grand jury, Khawaja allegedly provided that witness with false information about Nader and his connection Khawaja’s company. Boulos, Diab, Hill, and Whipple also are charged with obstructing the grand jury’s investigation by lying the FBI.

Khawaja donated OVER MILLION DOLLARS Democrat PAC Priorities USA!

By Jim Hayek
22 Comments
Leftists Want Professor Fired For Urging Caution During Impeachment Inquiry
Posted:Dec 6, 2019 7:01 am
Last Updated:Dec 8, 2019 5:24 am
290 Views

George Washington University Law professor Jonathan Turley, a Democrat and self-described liberal, testified before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday. Turley did not vote for President Trump and is in no way a staunch defender of the president. Turley simply pointed out that the charges against Trump are rather thin compared to past impeachments, and he cautioned Democrats to let go of their December due date on impeachment and take time to actually prove the allegations they have made against the president.

Pelosi slept on it, and then rushed out first thing Thursday morning to announce that she was moving forward with articles of impeachment. Clearly driven hate for the president, Pelosi came unglued after a reporter asked if she hated the president.

Because Professor Turley did not advocate for Trump's immediate removal day's end on Wednesday, the left responded the usual way they respond when presented with opposing viewpoints. They threatened Turley and called up George Washington University Law School to demand that the school immediately fire the professor.

Turley describes the left's reaction to his testimony in an article he wrote for The Hill. "My call for greater civility and dialogue may have been the least successful argument I made to the committee," Turley lamented. "Before I finished my testimony, my home and office were inundated with threatening messages and demands that I be fired from George Washington University for arguing that, while a case for impeachment can be made, it has not been made on this record."

Professor Turley was one of four law professors testifying before congress on the constitutional grounds for impeachment. Of course, the Democrats picked three anti-Trump law professors to balance out Turley's well-reasoned remarks. The three so-called experts joining Turley simply repeated every venomous thing they have ever heard on MSNBC. One nutty professor even had to apologize for using Barron Trump, Trump's thirteen-year-old , in one of her attacks against the president, a classless move that encapsulates the extreme partisanship in Nadler's choice of witnesses.

Now Turley understands what impeachment is really about. No one deserves to lose his job simply because he disagrees with the Democrats. Not even Trump.

Bronson Stocking
8 Comments
Warren Vows to End Electoral College if She Wins in 2020
Posted:Dec 4, 2019 4:30 am
Last Updated:Dec 5, 2019 2:38 am
301 Views

Leftists have a tendency of trying change the rules of the game when they’re losing the game. This is par for the course for Democrats who fail realize that their abysmal strategies and policies are why they will always lose.

In 2016, Democrats faced the greatest loss of all when President Donald Trump epically and indisputably beat Hillary Clinton. This shocked leftists who believed that 2016 was an easy win for Clinton; the left has yet to get over this which explains newfound calls to erase the Electoral College. After all, Trump defeated Clinton via the Electoral College, not the popular vote.

Over the weekend, Warren took to Twitter and professed that if she wins the 2020 presidential election, she’ll also end the Electoral College.

In a video, Warren professed her “goal” to be the “last American president” who is elected into office by the Electoral College. The senator stated that she wants to win her second term from the “direct vote” of the American people. Warren then spouted off a few more anti-Electoral College talking points by mentioning “democracy” and lauding the “popular vote.”

Warren’s statements tragically received great rounds of applause from audience members in the footage. What Warren’s audience, unfortunately, fails to realize is that the Electoral College exists so that states like California don’t determine the trajectory of an entire election.

Now, make no mistake, Warren is very much aware of this, but she’s lying to her supporters about the true motivations behind ending the Electoral College.

Ending the Electoral College is not about an interest in democracy or the inclusion of votes. By contrast, it’s about Democrats attempting to “right” what they view as the “wrong” which occurred during the 2016 election.

Had Hillary Clinton defeated Trump with her winning the Electoral College and losing the popular vote, no Democrat would be calling for the end of the Electoral College. As previously stated, when Democrats lose, they seek out new ways to change the rules in their favor. The Electoral College didn’t give the left what they wanted during the last general election, so now they seek to end it.

At the end of the day, this is what ending the Electoral College ultimately boils down to, no matter what lies Elizabeth Warren feeds to her impressionable supporters.

Doesn't Elizabeth Warren realize that the electoral college is part of the constitution. You can not just change it. It takes a lot including 37 states to ratify to change the constitution.

What you must realize is today's Democrat Party hates and wants to destroy the Constitution! The Founding Documents put too much limitation on the power of government! The Democrats want unlimited government power! In reality they will have succeeded in, for the most part, reducing the Constitution to meaningless words on worthless scraps of paper given lip service to make it appear the Founding Documents are still relevant! Eliminating the Electoral College would be the final nail in the coffin!

From the Conservative Brief
8 Comments
"Whistleblower" Testimony Is Vital
Posted:Dec 2, 2019 5:56 am
Last Updated:Dec 4, 2019 2:03 pm
412 Views

Democrats and Republicans have been fighting over whether the person who filed a complaint about President Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky—sparking the impeachment inquiry now underway against Trump—should be called testify publicly.

I believe the person, who is not technically a whistleblower, should be required testify before the House Intelligence Committee. Democrats who control the committee disagree. They killed a motion subpoena the so-called whistleblower, who has said through his attorney that he wants to remain anonymous.

Impeaching and removing a president is perhaps the most consequential thing Congress can do, short of declaring war.

In the case of a first-term president, impeachment deprives the American people of the chance to pass judgment on his actions and decide if they want to reelect him.

The American people need to know as much as possible about what the president is accused of. Yet the impeachment inquiry against Trump has been marked by secret proceedings, rules favoring one party over the other, and explosive accusations by people who may not even have firsthand knowledge. These are not the marks of a legitimate process. Indeed, they actively undercut the people’s trust.

As then-Sen. Joe Biden said during President Bill Clinton’s impeachment in 1998: “We in Congress had better be very careful before we upset [the people’s] decision and make darn sure … that our decision to impeach him was based on principle and not politics.”

Current House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., had some good advice back in 1998, when he was already serving in the House.

“There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment, when impeachment is supported by one of our major political parties and opposed by the other,” Nadler said 21 ago. “Such an impeachment will produce divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for come and will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions.”

Congress should heed that but wise and very relevant advice of Joe Biden and Jerrold Nadler today.
11 Comments
5 Things You Probably Didn't Know About Thanksgiving
Posted:Nov 28, 2019 8:18 am
Last Updated:Nov 30, 2019 3:23 am
402 Views

Happy Thanksgiving, folks! Whether you're looking for an interesting conversation starter or just really want to know more about Thanksgiving, these surprising facts will make you seem like the smartest person at the dinner table. So grab a drumstick, and enjoy these 5 tasty Thanksgiving tidbits…

The Original Thanksgiving Lasted for Three Days. When the Pilgrims and Wampanoag Indians celebrated the first Thanksgiving in November 21, they spent three glorious days feasting on venison, goose, duck, oysters, fish, and eel with cranberries and pumpkin -- but no turkey. Only five women are believed to have been present at the celebration among the 50 Pilgrims and 90 Native Americans. Originally, the Pilgrims intended to make it a day of prayer and fasting, but the arrival of the natives changed all that.

Pilgrims Didn’t Wear the Clothing that Are Commonly Depicted. Most illustrations of Pilgrims in movies, books, and advertising depict them wearing black or black and white with buckles on their hats and shoes. Buckles weren’t used until the late th century, and the Pilgrims normally only wore black and white on Sundays. During the week, they dressed in bright colors, which is proven the estates they left behind in which one woman had a red petticoat, blue stockings, and a purple waistcoat.

"Jingle Bells" Was Originally a Thanksgiving Song. James Pierpoint composed the song in 1857 for celebrating Thanksgiving. The title was "One Open Sleigh," and it was such a hit that it was sung again at Christmas. The song quickly became associated with the Christmas holiday season, and the title was officially changed in 1859, two years later.

TV Dinners Were Inspired Thanksgiving. In 53, the TV-dinner company Swanson overestimated the demand for turkey over 260 tons. The owners of the company had no idea what to do with all the leftovers, so they enlisted the of company salesman Gerry Thomas. Taking inspiration from airplane meals, Thomas ordered 5,000 aluminum trays, and loaded them with the turkey leftovers to create the first TV dinner.

Sarah Josepha Hale is Known as The "Godmother of Thanksgiving." Sarah Josepha Hale was a woman truly dedicated to the cause of there being a Thanksgiving holiday. So dedicated in fact that she spent years campaigning for it and wrote letters to five different presidents. Sometimes referred to as the “Godmother of Thanksgiving,” Hale wrote countless articles and letters to persuade President Abraham Lincoln to officially declare Thanksgiving a national holiday that recurred every year. Hale mentioned in her letter that having such a national day of Thanksgiving would establish a "Great Union Festival of America." What is Sarah Josepha Hale’s other claim to fame? She was the author of the nursery rhyme, "Mary Had a Little Lamb."

From the Trivia Today Blog
3 Comments
Democrats Have 'Cold Feet' Over Impeachment
Posted:Nov 26, 2019 2:10 am
Last Updated:Nov 26, 2019 2:10 am
419 Views

Poll after poll has shown that Americans are increasingly opposed the Democrats' partisan impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) has repeatedly beaten the impeachment drum, saying the American people do want to "get to the bottom" of what took place in Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

But you know the impeachment inquiries aren't going very well when Washington Post Congressional Reporter Rachael Bade is admitting Democrats are having cold feet pursuing this agenda.

“I think what we're starting to see, you know, is when the impeachment inquiry was first announced and [Democrats] started to do these depositions, a lot of people were asking, 'Can Nancy Pelosi peel off any Republicans?'" Bade asked "But I increasingly think the question is becoming does [Nancy Pelosi] lose more Democrats? Because Republicans have really unified behind the president, and although Democrats voted against the impeachment inquiry rules that they voted on a couple of weeks ago, we are hearing behind-the-scenes there are moderates getting cold feet. And it comes back these ads and people being afraid for being punished for voting impeach the president.”

Democrats are "getting cold feet" because this is no longer about an impeachment inquiry. This is about whether or not draft articles of impeachment, which would then move the Senate (assuming the vote passed the House). This impeachment vote puts Democrats from red and purple areas between a rock and a hard place. When these Democrats stuck with their party and voted in favor of an impeachment inquiry, they were able argue this was merely an investigation "get the facts" surrounding Ukraine, not an actual bill move forward with impeaching President Trump. Now those same Democrats have vote and go on-the-record with whether or not they believe Trump's offenses were impeachable. That makes them vulnerable in districts where their constituents voted for Trump.

By Beth Baumann
1 comment
Russian Interference and Congressional Stupidity
Posted:Nov 25, 2019 3:15 am
Last Updated:Dec 2, 2019 7:36 am
625 Views

“We will take America without firing a shot. We do not have to invade the U.S. We will destroy you from within....” quote attributed to Nikita Khrushchev.

I figure most if not all of you remember those words coming from Khrushchev. Well as we know he is not here to see it but his prophecy is coming true under the direction of Vladimir Putin. The bad part is both the political parties have fallen victim to it and we the American People are the worse for it. Other than pursuing the President with multiple investigations, House Democrats do not have much of an agenda. There has been little to no action on healthcare, the opioid crisis, infrastructure, the USMCA trade agreement, immigration reform, border security the list could go on and on. By creating a stranglehold on any progress to benefit the American People, the Russians have effectively shut down the government of the United States.

Russia played both sides of the field in 20, and Russian actions both helped and hurt each candidate. Putin threw a fishing line coated with bait and both parties swallowed it hook line and sinker. Russia hurt Clinton by hacking her emails, but also helped her with the anti-Trump Steele Dossier.

In the big scheme of things, Russia doesn’t really care whether a Democrat or a Republican is in office. The sooner Democrats realize that and quit playing into Russian hands with their incessant anti-Trump divisiveness, the better off this whole country will be.

That strikes to the heart of the matter, a basic truth that far too many Democrats and media figures refuse to acknowledge. Russia didn’t side with Trump or Clinton in 20 but attempted to harm and smear both so that whichever one ultimately prevailed would, theoretically, be weakened upon assuming the Oval Office.

This is exactly what the Russian government was hoping for. If they seed misinformation, they seed doubt, they have everybody questioning the legitimacy of a presidential candidate, be it President Trump or potentially a President Clinton, that they would pit one side of our electorate against the other, that they would pit one party against the other.

Fiona Hill said the following, “So if Secretary, former first lady, former Sen. Clinton had been elected as president — as indeed many expected in the run-up prior to the election in 20 — she, too, would have had major questions about her legitimacy.”

Several Sources
22 Comments

To link to this blog (bigblock46) use [blog bigblock46] in your messages.