|
|
|
|
DARTER, YES I READ MY BLOGS C/P HOW ELSE WOULDI KNOW TO POST. PLSE DONT PUSH THIS ANY FURTHER
|
Posted:Jan 17, 2023 5:58 pm
Last Updated:Jan 18, 2023 10:11 pm 774 Views
|
YOU WERE ONCE A GOOD FRIEND. YOU USED THE LORD'S NAME IN VAIN MANY TIMES BEFORE I WARNED U TO NOT USE IT AGAIN.
IN SPITE OF THE WARNING U DID AGAIN. SO I BLOCKED U
SINCE THEN I HAVE NOT MENTIONED U NOR ANYTHING IN UR BLOGS
FOR SOME REASON. RECENTLY U HAVE STARTED COMMENTING ABOUT THE BLOG NUMBER NOW THE COMMENT THAT I POST AN PROBABLY DON'T READ THEM.
SO I AM ASKING YOU VERY NICELY. PLEASE DON'T MENTION ME, THE NUMBER OF BLOGS I POST OR WHETHER I HAVE A PICTURE OR NOT, OR THE FACT THEY CAN OR CAN NOT BE COPIED AND PASTED.
AS I SAID U ONCE WAS A GOOD FRIEND. THAT IS THE ONLY REASON I AM ASKING U NICELY TO NOT MENTION ME, MY BLOGS THE CONTENTS, OR THE SETUP OF MY BLOGS.
IF U DON'T LIKE MY BLOGS OR THE NUMBER THEREOF. PLEASE IGNORE
PLEASE DON'T PUSH THIS ANY FURTHER. I CAN BE THE NASTY MF"ER U EVER SAW. I CAN BE NASTY RUDE CRUDE AND CARELESS ABOUT WHO MY COMMENTS HURT OR OFFENDS.
I HAVE OPENED THIS BLOG SO U CAN READ IT. SO AFTER U READ IT. PLEASE BLOG AS U CHOOSE AND IGNORE ME OR MY BLOGS. I CAN ASK NO MORE NOR NO NICER
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
|
|
BOB:Biden may be at greater risk of criminal jeopardy than Trump in documents scandal
|
Posted:Jan 17, 2023 9:18 am
Last Updated:Jan 17, 2023 6:20 pm 735 Views
|
WELL WELL WELL. NOW WHAT WILL CP ID, KOFFLA IS AND THE MASTER OF ID BOB. BLOG ABOUT
Federal prosecutors have brought numerous cases against others who have been negligent in their handling of classified documents
With each new discovery of classified documents at Joe Biden’s home and office the case grows stronger that the president could well be charged with crimes.
The principal law that Biden appears to have violated repeatedly is 18 USC 793 which makes it a crime to remove national defense (i.e., classified) material with the intent to retain it in an unauthorized location.
A private office, garage, and home are obviously unauthorized because they are not sufficiently secure from intrusion. The nation’s secrets are vulnerable to theft by foreign adversaries. Keeping his prized Corvette in the same garage with classified documnents is not a viable defense.
In Biden’s case, the increasing number of different locations where classified records were found is compelling circumstantial evidence that this was not simply a single instance where a record was "inadvertently" misplaced. Instead, there are three locations –and counting. This suggests that their placement was both knowing and intentional. The number of documents is not nearly as incriminating as the number of locations where they were kept without mandated safeguards.
But intent is not the only legal standard. Under the law, lesser proof of "gross negligence" is enough to merit criminal charges. Here, Biden has all but admitted such reckless or extremely careless actions by attributing the wayward documents to inadvertence. Indeed, the word is the literal dictionary definition of carelessness.
Gregg Jarrett: 'Biden is at more cr*minal risk than Trump' Video
There is little question that Biden’s mishandling of these national s*curity materials was, at the very least, grossly negligent. Malign actors may well have gained access. The president’s , Hunter Biden, who is under cr*minal investigation for influence peddling schemes involving foreign entities, had routine and ready access. The elder Biden refused to maintain visitor logs at his home where he has spent much of his presidency, so there’s no telling who else was within close proximity.
Federal prosecutors have brought numerous cases against individuals who mishandled classified documents in much the same way that Biden did.
David Petraeus, who was director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) kept classified documents at his home. He faced c*iminal charges and pleaded guilty.
John Deutch, also CIA director, stored classified information in his residence. While negotiating a plea agreement with prosecutors, he received a presidential pardon. Others have been charged for far more minor violations.
Equally disturbing is how Biden handled the matter. His use of lawyers to retrieve documents is baffling to the point of suspicion. It indicates he likely knew that classified records were kept in illegal places.
Moreover, some of his lawyers admittedly had no security clearance. This raises the possibility of additional cr*mes committed during the collection process. Since the attorneys were acting at Biden’s direction, he would be culpable if they viewed any of the classified information. Yet, he urged them to continue their search for more.
Biden insists that he "takes classified material very seriously" and has been "transparent" throughout. This is demonstrably false. First, upon discovery of the initial batch of documents on November 2, 2022, he and his lawyers did not immediately alert either the FBI or the Department of Justice. They notified the National Archives. Did the Biden team hope that the agency would overlook the criminal nature of what happened and sweep the affair under the rug? It was the archives –not Biden– that informed the DOJ two days after the discovery. So much for taking it seriously.
Rep. Jim Jordan on Biden classified documents: What kind of investigation was this for
first 2 months
Second, Biden’s actions are the antithesis of transparency. After publicly slamming Donald Trump as "irresponsible" for allegedly mishandling classified records, the president actively concealed his own scandal from the American public for more than two long months. As voters were casting ballots in the midterm elections and his Attorney General Merrick Garland was appointing a special counsel to investigate Trump, Biden remained mum. How convenient. He was forced to come clean only when CBS News broke the story on January 9, 2023. Had it not been for the aggressive reporting of the network, Biden’s potential c*imes might still be hidden.
cly announced the appointment of a special counsel for Trump on November 18. By then, the attorney general had known of Biden’s classified breach for two weeks but said nothing. A month later on December 20, the president’s lawyers found even more classified records in his Delaware garage and informed Garland who remained publicly silent. Biden’s lawyers located the third and fourth sets of classified records just last week.
Where was the FBI in all of this? The uncovering of vulnerable classified material constitutes various crime scenes. Why weren’t agents immediately dispatched to those venues to secure the premises and collect the evidence? This is their first duty. Their second duty is to scour all other possible Biden locations where more materials might be housed. It never happened. A full 73 days elapsed between the first and last discoveries. There was no sense of urgency in protecting top-secret documents that might put our nation’s security at risk. Even Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., admitted that Biden might have jeopardized national s^curity.
Unlike Trump, no subpoenas or warrants were issued. No grand jury was convened or r*ids ordered. To the contrary, a potential c*iminal defendant was allowed to have his compromised lawyers search for incriminating evidence against their own . This absurdity turns justice on its head. Their duty is to protect Biden, not gather evidence against him for the government’s benefit. However, none of this seems to bother Garland in the least.
Biden’s defenders, including some in the media, assert that the president’s conduct pales in comparison to Trump’s because there were more documents at Mar-a-Lago.
Mark Penn: Biden classified documents were a 'sideshow,' his business dealings are notVid
This is misleading for several reasons. Whether it is twenty (Biden) or more than a hundred (Trump), the legal issue at stake is classification status, not numbers.
The former president insists he declassified the records before he departed office. The law affords him unfettered discretion to do so. Whether it occurred has not been litigated or otherwise determined. If the materials at his residence were no longer classified, then he has not run afoul of the aforementioned statutes.
Biden as vice president did not have the same authority to declassify. Some news outlets have reported that an executive order signed by then-president Barack Obama in December of 2009 conferred the same power to Biden. However, the legality of that order is problematic because a president cannot unilaterally alter, modify, or expand an exclusive constitutional power. Regardless, the matter is irrelevant since Biden is not claiming he declassified anything before leaving office.
As I have written before, the Trump records are a dispute over custody of papers that is governed by the Presidential Records Act of 1978. This controlling statute is civil, not c*iminal.
The proper remedy for Garland was to seek a return of the contested documents by filing a motion in civil court and allow an impartial judge to resolve the conflict.
Biden doesn't have any defenses in classified documents scandal: John RatcliffeVideo
It is not obstruction of justice for Trump to assert his rights under the Presidential Records Act. This is what Bill Clinton did in a similar case a decade ago. At the time, the Justice Department argued that a former president can keep whatever documents he wants and the government has no authority to seize them.
Trump was following the same standard enunciated by the DOJ and endorsed by both the National Archives and a U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.
For these reasons, Biden is at greater risk than Trump of c&iminal jeopardy. Garland would be g*ilty of selective prosecution if he decides to proceed against the latter while protecting the former.
Our current president’s classified scandal that was deliberately covered-up for more than two months renders any potential prosecution of his predecessor fatuous and futile.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
BOB:Tactical Commander for US Capitol Police Admits Under Oath that “Agitators”Were “Highly Trained
|
Posted:Jan 16, 2023 10:01 am
Last Updated:Jan 16, 2023 1:38 pm 748 Views
|
TO THE TRUMP HATERS HERE ON SFF. PLAINLY, YOU ARE STUPID!!. U HAVE BEEN CONNED BY THE LIBERAL PRESS AND THE RADICAL DEMS AND U OWN THE SHYT GOING ON IN THE USA NOW.
ALL CUZ HATED TRUMP
SAME AS U-DUMB FUGGS TAKING THE CLOT SHOT.
SHEEP!!!! WEAK-MINDED SHEEP!!
I HOPE ALL OF U ARE SEEING WHAT WE TRIED TO TELL U.
U HAVA POTUS THAT IS INCOMPETENT, LIES, AND CARELESS, YET U STILL KEEP UR NOSE UP HIS AZZ.
LEAVE AMERICA. U DONT DESERVE THE FREEDOMS THAT VET FOUGHT AND DIED FOR FOR YEARS
Ripped Down Fencing Prior to Protest at US Capitol on Jan. 6
During the discussion author and investigative reporter, Julie Kelly dropped a bomb from J-6 defendant Richard Barnett’s jury trial last week.
Julie discussed new evidence she wrote about in her latest column at American Greatness – Captain Carneysha Mendoza, a tactical commander for U.S. Capitol Police at the time, admitted under oath last week that a group of “agitators” who were “highly trained” destroyed security barriers and lured people to Capitol grounds that day.
Defense Counsel Brad Geyer: Isn’t it true that you had a lot of people, a large quantity of people walking down two streets that dead-ended at the Capitol?
Mendoza: Yes, sir.
Geyer: And would it be fair to say that at least at some of the leading edges of that crowd, they contained bad people or provocateurs; is that fair?
Mendoza: It’s fair.
Geyer: Dangerous people?
Mendoza: Yes.
Geyer: Violent people?
Mendoza: Yes.
Geyer: Highly trained violent people?
Mendoza: Yes.
Geyer: Highly trained violent people who work and coordinate together?
Mendoza: Yes
It was a stunning admission, representing the first time a top law enforcement official stated under oath (to my knowledge) that a coordinated, experienced group of agitators engaged in much of the mischief early that day. Under further questioning, Mendoza acknowledged those same individuals “pushed through barriers, removed barriers, threw barriers over the side, removed fencing, and eased the flow of people into places where they shouldn’t be.” This happened around 1:00 p.m., the same time the joint session of Congress convened to debate the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Hiding the pivotal role of still unidentified—and uncharged—agitators on January 6 is just one reason why the government has successfully sought to conceal thousands of hours of footage captured by the Capitol police’s security system before, during, and after the protest.
There is now evidence that dozens of federal operatives were involved in the 2021 January 6 protests on Capitol Hill.
The Gateway Pundit has reported on this for over two years now.
TGP reported evidence of at least 12 incidents involving dozens of federal agents working inside the crowd on January 6.
We’ve known for two years numerous federal operatives were involved in the January 6, 2021 protests.
This is something we reported on before. Who were the mysterious people who arrived early at the US Capitol and took down all of the fencing and barriers while President Donald Trump was still talking at the Ellipse a mile away?
Julie Kelly reported:
Captain Carneysha Mendoza, a tactical commander for U.S. Capitol Police at the time, testified Wednesday how a group of agitators destroyed security barriers and lured people to Capitol grounds that afternoon:
On Sunday night, Julie Kelly from American Greatness, along with several J6 prisoners, conservatives reporters, j6 family members, and even liberal trolls, joined in the “J6 Truth Exposed” Twitter Space hosted by The Gateway Pundit.
|
|
|
1
comment
|
|
