| Blogs > > My Blog |
|
Member Deleted Post This post has been deleted by |
|||
11/22/2019 2:52 am |
That was the testimony I anticipated the most and boy was it well beyond my hopes. I'm not a fan of Bolton and I don't think he will testify but I wish he would. America needs that testimony. But you have to be brain dead not to grasp we have a president that is guilty of bribing a foreign leader under threat of invasion and slaughter to interfere in our election, harm the reputation of American citizens he took an oath to protect and do it for his own benefit. I think many republicans are brain dead on multiple levels but now we know their support for corruption, clear corruption defines the corrupt nature of their own poor reputation and bankrupt moral values.
| ||
11/22/2019 3:12 am |
Perhaps Bolton could testify in the senate trial.
| ||
11/22/2019 3:19 am |
Perhaps the whistleblower will come forward and testify in the senate trial. Give them what they seek at the opportune moment. Save the best 2 for last & torpedo the stinking, sinking ship. LOL Party On!
| ||
|
Trump needs to take the stand and the oath along with all the others that have been ordered to ignore their subpoenas. If Trump is so innocent why is he fighting to keep people from testifying? Trump should be a proud American and not waste anymore time on this investigation, he needs to "woman up" and take the stand. I would bet he would get the HIGHEST ratings EVER! What are your thoughts on Russia being behind the fake news that it was Ukraine that interfered with our Elections? Doesn't that sit you back just a little to think that you may be playing right into the Russians attempt to create chaos? You asked why Fiona was there at the impeachment inquiry? Seriously? Did you watch the hearing or at least Fiona's testimony?
| ||
|
What difference does it make who the whistle blower is since there are so many others who have testified and have corroborated the whistle blower's charge.
| ||
|
All the witnesses have been "FACT" witnesses. FACT, at least 3 people have now said they heard Trump on the phone with Sondland while discussing the investigation into the Bidens. All these witnesses are providing information which when all added up and put together becomes clear there was a "drug deal" being put together. One witness' information alone probably doesn't set off many alarms, but put them together and thing fall into place and corroborate the initial claims of the whistle blower. You can get a timeline as to when events happened, such as the releasing of the funds to Ukraine AFTER the whistle blower's information was relayed to the White House. I am trying to figure out your stance, is it if the whistle blower hadn't spoken up then Trumps corrupt plan to get dirt on his opponent by withholding financial support was okay in your eyes? I do believe you could have listened in on that conversation and you would still blame the whistle blower or whatever the current White House talking point is at the moment.
| ||
|
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano said Thursday on “Fox & Friends” that Democrats have a case for impeaching President Trump after U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland’s congressional testimony. “One would expect the president, in September, after the whistleblower's allegations came out, after the president was accused of a quid pro quo, to say ‘no quid pro quo.’ Here we go with the Latin again,” Napolitano said. “But it is clear from what Ambassador Sondland testified yesterday that there was an understanding that the president wanted some things from the Ukrainians.” Sondland, a Republican mega-donor and Trump’s hand-picked ambassador, delivered explosive testimony to the House Intelligence Committee that linked the president to a politically motivated pressure campaign in Ukraine. Sondland said that Trump dictated Ukraine policy through his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and that Giuliani was demanding a quid pro quo: No White House visit for Ukraine’s new president until Kyiv agreed to publicly announce investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. The ambassador also testified that he sent an email to then-Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and other Trump officials informing them that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was prepared to announce a probe. “Rick Perry knew it. Mick Mulvaney knew it," Napolitano said on the Fox News morning show. "Now, when allegations like that are made, and the committee subpoenas those people, and they don't show, for whatever reason, the committee can infer that their testimony would be consistent with the ambassador’s." Napolitano also defended Sondland, a billionaire hotel magnate, against the president’s attacks. “So the ambassador is not a never Trumper. He is not a Democrat,” Napolitano said. “He's not somebody wanting to disrupt. This is the guy who's given a million dollars to the Republican Party and is the most important Trump-nominated ambassador in Europe. And he's saying this is what happened.”
|
×
×