| Blogs > > My Blog |
|
Member Deleted Post This post has been deleted by |
|||
|
You must be watching different hearings than the rest of us. Non ego te hic placere
| ||
|
You must be watching different hearings than the rest of us. Some us watch the Democrat facts, others the Republican spin.
| ||
|
What the H is Jim Jordan doing there....It's like bringing a rabid,mangy,mongrel to a thorough breed show.
| ||
11/19/2019 5:22 pm |
Jordan in leading the witness confuses both himself and the witness which in turn does not make much of a point in the discussion. LOL Like directions on a road map with no destination. But it makes for a good show. Party On!
| ||
11/20/2019 3:51 am |
You support racist Steve King of Iowa who was stripped of all committee assignments because of his racism. That' pretty STUPID dude...and it just demonstrates that there are STUPID people in Ohio as well. As you know VOTER fraud was rampant in Iowa as the arrest of a woman voting for Trump twice made a complete fool out of you. Good Lord Dude....the depth of your incompetence is mind numbing.
| ||
|
What difference does it make who the whistleblower is at this point.....everything he/she said has already been corroborated many times over.......I don't understand how you can't see that Schiff isn't lying when he says he doesn't know who the whistleblower is, he is maintaining his anonymity, which is protected by law........You call Schiff a liar for following the law, yet Jordan's criminal dishonesty of not protecting his students from a sexual predator just goes right over your head......... I just watched Jordan questioning Sondland and he was so nonsensical and frantic that Sondland laughed.......Jordan was frantic and confused, asking ludicrous questions, like who was at a meeting that never happened......
| ||
11/21/2019 7:23 am |
ROFL You Have Now Entered The Twilight Zone
| ||
11/22/2019 3:40 am |
Block I understand it is against the law to identify a whistleblower. Therefore anyone putting a name out there (speculative or otherwise) would be subject to having the boom lowered on them. The one enforcing the law (lowering the boom) would not be required to know who the whistle blower is. Got It? Or is that asking too much?????? LOL Party On!
|
×
×