Close Please enter your Username and Password


bigblock46 73M
12048 posts
6/24/2019 1:59 pm
Disgusting: Slimy Democrats


Democrats on Capitol Hill want Americans to believe they're super serious about conducting oversight of the Trump administration, but their behavior last week again proves the opposite. They are unprofessional and unserious hacks out to attack President Trump and anyone who dares to work for him.
Former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks testified behind closed doors in front of the House Judiciary Committee last week. She flew in from California with a team of lawyers to do so after already cooperating for hours with the Mueller investigation.

During her testimony, Democrats were taking photos of her. It got so uncomfortable, her attorneys had to request Chairman Jerry Nadler ask them to stop. Not surprisingly, Nadler had to be prompted and didn't stop them on his own.

From the transcript:

Mr. Trout [Hicks attorney]: Mr.Chairman, I think there are a number of people taking pictures here, and I just want to say that I think it's making the witness uncomfortable. And I would very much appreciate it as a courtesy, if nothing else, if we could--

Chairman Nadler. That's fine. If people will please refrain from taking pictures.

Adding insult to injury Nadler, the guy who issued the subpoena for Hicks to testify, repeatedly called her "Ms. Lewindowski." When repeatedly corrected, Nadler feigned ignorance, pretended not to know her name despite being the lawmaker who forced her to testify and then said he was too distracted to get her name right. That is of course a lie and Nadler repeatedly called her by a different name to shame and embarrass her under oath.

Even CNN, yes, CNN, was appalled.

Judiciary Committee Democrats, including Chairman Nadler, aren't professional lawmakers interested in oversight. Instead, they regularly engage in unserious, unethical and shameless abuses of power.

By Katie Pavlich

bigblock46 73M
9552 posts
6/24/2019 2:02 pm

Ms Hicks should have not responded at all since he directed his questions towards someone other than the witness and when he got all blustery informed him that she thought he was directing the question at someone else.He really deserved to be made to look like the idiot he is for not having the courtesy to address her correctly.


kneedtwoplease 64M
1084 posts
6/24/2019 4:53 pm

Another concrete example where it is perfectly OK to abuse a woman. Disagree with one of the enlightened and whatever your gender, race, tendencies... et al, no matter. It should concern some people their minds might be dusty


Katie_au_lait 73F
6702 posts
6/25/2019 12:42 am

Why is this frivolous incident more important to you than slimy disgusting Trump cultist abusers locking innocent children in concentration camps?

I wont hold my breath for an answer.


bigblock46 73M
9552 posts
6/25/2019 4:27 am

    Quoting Katie_au_lait:
    Why is this frivolous incident more important to you than slimy disgusting Trump cultist abusers locking innocent children in concentration camps?

    I wont hold my breath for an answer.

Ever since the end of World War II, the term "concentration camp" has come to mean unimaginable bestiality where untold numbers of people died. No one is being whipped and made to work until dead from exhaustion. There is no crematorium, and no one is being crucified upside down as they were at Buchenwald, where a nearby area was called the “singing forest,” so named for the screams of the dying.


Katie_au_lait 73F
6702 posts
6/25/2019 7:33 am

That's not what I asked


bigblock46 73M
9552 posts
6/25/2019 8:38 am

It would be futile to explain anything to you. It would not matter what I said you would find fault with it. Probably should have ignored your question which is as bad as the Democrats asking Ms Hicks about her love life or Mr Nadlers referring to her as Ms Lewindowski. It goes to showing how Democrats are totally obsessed with "getting Trump" that common sense questions and common courtesy are tossed out.


sparkleflit 72F
5063 posts
6/25/2019 8:21 pm

Did you actually listen to Hicks's testimony, or was copying this article the extent of your information?.......Hick's testimony consisted almost exclusively of "Can't recall".........so this poor Hope she tried so hard to co operate is BS......


sparkleflit 72F
5063 posts
6/25/2019 9:15 pm

    Quoting bigblock46:
    It would be futile to explain anything to you. It would not matter what I said you would find fault with it. Probably should have ignored your question which is as bad as the Democrats asking Ms Hicks about her love life or Mr Nadlers referring to her as Ms Lewindowski. It goes to showing how Democrats are totally obsessed with "getting Trump" that common sense questions and common courtesy are tossed out.
Did you read the deposition or is this article your only source of information on this hearing. If you read the deposition you will see the absolute nonsense that Nadler had to put up with from Hick's lawyers. They objected to almost every question placed by Nadler......He was trying to get information about Lewendowski and he had to keep repeating the name and slightly change the wording of his questions to try and eke out information between the lawyer's constant interruptions.......it went something like this.....Miss Hicks, did Mr.Lewindowski----? Objection......repeat over and over, for hours on end......Anyone would have gotten frustrated and aggravated to the point of confusion......Nadler apologized to Hope Hicks for the confusion, saying he was preoccupied............Hope Hicks answered very few questions......her lawyers pled complete immunity to answering any questions pertaining to her time as Trump's assistance......so basically, it was a freaking waste of time......


bigblock46 73M
9552 posts
6/26/2019 4:08 am

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    Did you read the deposition or is this article your only source of information on this hearing. If you read the deposition you will see the absolute nonsense that Nadler had to put up with from Hick's lawyers. They objected to almost every question placed by Nadler......He was trying to get information about Lewendowski and he had to keep repeating the name and slightly change the wording of his questions to try and eke out information between the lawyer's constant interruptions.......it went something like this.....Miss Hicks, did Mr.Lewindowski----? Objection......repeat over and over, for hours on end......Anyone would have gotten frustrated and aggravated to the point of confusion......Nadler apologized to Hope Hicks for the confusion, saying he was preoccupied............Hope Hicks answered very few questions......her lawyers pled complete immunity to answering any questions pertaining to her time as Trump's assistance......so basically, it was a freaking waste of time......
Ms Hicks lawyers were doing their job. I don't see you complaining about Mrs Clinton or Mr Comey using the same words in their testimony.


sparkleflit 72F
5063 posts
6/26/2019 8:27 am

    Quoting bigblock46:
    Ms Hicks lawyers were doing their job. I don't see you complaining about Mrs Clinton or Mr Comey using the same words in their testimony.
You just posted a blog whining about how poor Hope Hicks wasn't treated right ......that she was victimized by Nadler.........and I'm responding to it...why would I bring Clinton and Comey into it?........Your whataboutism has become pathetic.


bigblock46 73M
9552 posts
6/26/2019 8:53 am

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    You just posted a blog whining about how poor Hope Hicks wasn't treated right ......that she was victimized by Nadler.........and I'm responding to it...why would I bring Clinton and Comey into it?........Your whataboutism has become pathetic.

People deserve to be treated with respect when you are asking questions. Something Jerry Nadler has not learned. I now what I would have answered anyone who asked about my love life, only SFF frowns on vulgar language.