Close Please enter your Username and Password


posts

Member Deleted Post


This post has been deleted by

TxJW21 81M

6/5/2019 7:06 am

Block I think the problem with news media has been growing for many years up until now.

Way back there I would watch the state of the union address.-----Then the news guys would immediately come on tv to tell me what to think about what I just heard.

They assume people are dumb and can not decipher what actually goes on.
They are also RIGHT. Most people have a single mindset and slant everything to what they WANT TO HEAR rather than recognize facts. Plus if a favorite person says something the (believe) without thinking.

I remember many years ago after state of the union addresses------I would sit there thinking -----why do I need someone to tell me the meaning of what I just heard ????? LOL
I think it is called narratives for the not so intelligent. LOL

Sooooo the article is right-----news media is designed with the intention of (dividing) the people in order to get cooperate stoolies elected.

IF the (PEOPLE) ever get together ( FOR THE PEOPLE ) the corporate representatives will be history & they (AL know it regardless of party.

The corporate capitalist system brings about Fox News etc. and how the rooskies can influence voters.
Party On!


TxJW21 81M

6/5/2019 8:11 am

Yes the media would have remained silent if Hillary was elected along with the same people who remain silent with mention of the criminal Clinton Foundation. pay for play (bribery) scheme---which was in full public view.
Plus Obama had to know about it.
Party On!


TxJW21 81M

6/5/2019 8:19 am

Clinton should be in the cell next to Manafort.


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
6/5/2019 9:14 am

Bozell and his Mobil Oil funded Media Research are extremely biased.....their whole reason for existing is to tear down the media......and Bozell totally put Trump down until he won.....then suddenly he was on his side......

Another example of your taste for extremist garbage.....


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
6/5/2019 12:50 pm

As per usual you attack the messenger".......You keep saying that, yet never tell us what you mean by it, who you are referring to. You seem to think that the words you post were delivered by someone whose only characteristic is to relay the words........as if everything else is magically erased somehow. Is that how you vote as well? In your reality, candidates have no previous actions or communications......They just appear on your screen as a clean slate and you believe their message without researching them? All previous messages and actions are magically erased?.....Do I need to point out that you are deplorably inconsistent?

Let me tell you about this thing called integrity.......something you seem to have never considered.


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
6/5/2019 12:57 pm

    Quoting  :

I'm not calling it "garbage" because I don't agree with it, but because , it is a low quality product......I don't expect you to ever understand the distinction.


TxJW21 81M

6/5/2019 3:22 pm

I read a university study two days ago on how immigration affects Texas. It was somewhat of an awakening.-----pros & cons on (every) aspect.

Many things I did not realize.

Also------One effect of immigration of younger people with kids AND getting them on tax rolls CAN ACTUALLY HELP the social security system financially BECAUSE it is NOW bogged down with MORE elderly people like ME. LOL

Sooooo I am not as single minded in saying we need a wall.----what we need is more working families paying taxes. Amnesty???????

(PLUS) since the amount of jobs can not be filled (NOW) bring them all in & help them find those jobs.

Every Mexican I hired was a hard worker----I can not say that about the natives.

The study had percentage statistics of freeloading immigrants vs native trash freeloading people ---much of it is counter to what I have believed for years.----

Most immigrants coming to Texas move quickly to available jobs RATHER THAN freeload.
Party On!


Katie_au_lait 78F
7026 posts
6/6/2019 2:44 am

    Quoting  :

For goodness sake! Sparkle did not call you "a deplorable" you silly man! She said that you were deplorably inconsistent...a very different thing!. If you do not understand the usage of the words and grammar she used, it's hardly her fault.

It might surprise you that deplorable and deplorably are words that existed in common use English language long before Hillary Clinton made her famous "deplorables" comment. Sad that you only understand one single usage of the word(s).

Why don't you give your brain a treat and use it sometimes instead of blaming others because you can't understand their language skills?

Try grammarly!


TxJW21 81M

6/6/2019 6:19 am

Double Speak LOLOL ??????
I never have to ( guess ) at what LuLu is saying.
Anyone who can not (understand) it has a definite problem.
She tells it like it (IS) better than anyone I have seen here.
Blanket statements without substance do not get it.
Party On!


Katie_au_lait 78F
7026 posts
6/6/2019 6:22 am

    Quoting  :

Yes, yes...I know that you can look things up on your computer, but just doing that isn't good enough...you need to understand how they fit within spoken and written language. The difference between "a" and "an" is one of the Is the most basic things we learn as children...why don't you know that?

When you understand that to say "a adjective, and "a adverb" is improper use of grammar... (one that you use constantly), you may just have the right to criticise Sparkle's use of English.



TxJW21 81M

6/6/2019 6:34 am

Block check if the end spelling of the word and go from there.
Just trying to help you out here. LOL
Party On!


TxJW21 81M

6/6/2019 6:48 am

Block like I have been saying-----fishing is relaxing, more fun & you don't have to know squat about it.
Come down here --- I will load the boat & spring for the Dr Pepper.
Party On!