| Blogs > > My Blog |
|
Member Deleted Post This post has been deleted by |
|||
4/24/2019 6:54 am |
Even if (THEY) was a priest who leads you in church every Sunday? Do you think God would give a church rampant with pedophiles the Sodom & Gomorrah treatment? Would he destroy (burn) a church as a sign of what is right by him? Vengeance is not allowed in your faith according to the Lord. You must be a (do as I say, not as I do Baptist. Hey don't blame me. YOU brought it up. YOU are the man with the answers. Party On!
| ||
|
GARBAGE!!!!!....Conspiracy theorists and Right wing extremist propaganda..Do you have any standards at all regarding what you read?...LOL....The guy who runs this site used to work on Roy Moore's politucal campaign........Ironic, huh?
| ||
4/24/2019 9:16 am |
Those are legitimate questions brought about by the material you post. Rather than attack me perhaps you could comment further on your blog material like you so often demand others should do? LOL Closed mind? He is watching everything you do. You have created your own opportunity to expound on your chosen material for the day. Sooooo Go For IT! LOL How does Sodom & Gonnorhea compare to a modern day church of pedophiles? Sorry about the spelling. LOL Party On!
| ||
|
Those are legitimate questions brought about by the material you post. Rather than attack me perhaps you could comment further on your blog material like you so often demand others should do? LOL Closed mind? He is watching everything you do. You have created your own opportunity to expound on your chosen material for the day. Sooooo Go For IT! LOL How does Sodom & Gonnorhea compare to a modern day church of pedophiles? Sorry about the spelling. LOL Party On!
| ||
|
Do you realise that if you do that...you'd have to start with priests and pastors...who are, by a long way, the most numerous group of paedophiles. I can't help wondering( and I know for a fact that I'm not the only one) if that's why they become priests in the first place...since until recently it has protected them from prosecution.
| ||
|
Exactly.......Bigblock peruses the extreme Right propaganda sites .....He has said many times that he agrees with everything he posts.......but, apparently, he can't expound on it or defend it.......He seems to see his role as a "messanger" who is sacrosanct.......He also believes that the author's character,history, previous writings, professional choices, etc. have absolutely no bearing on their work........Apparently Biglock sees himself as the archangel Gabriel.
| ||
4/24/2019 3:24 pm |
Rock you are wrong on many counts----I do not control suffering like you say I do. God has a plan for everyone and knows them individually by name. He is the one in charge. NOT ME. You are wrong in swearing vengeance on one of Gods children. That is in direct conflict with his specific command. Putting yourself in place of God when it involves one of his children is not a wise thing to do, considering the fact that God may choose to forgive the pervert who hurts your children. IN FACT he sent his only begotten son to die on the cross so that sinners are forgiven of their sins. It's not your call. You are wrong on having choices. A Christian has only ONE choice and that is to obey God and his commands. If you have heard something other than that being said you were in the wrong Gods house. You are wrong in saying God does not make choices for us. God controls and holds judgment on everything you do. If the choice is yours then stop praying for God to handle the situation. Your blog mentioned Sodom & the other city destroyed for evil. God watched over the destruction THEN and certainly has the power to destroy a church rampant with pedophiles NOW. And I will suggest progressives do not have a monopoly on the misdeeds as your blog mentioned. No questions in this one. LOL Party On!
| ||
|
Are you even aware that the choices you make affect the lives of others? For instance...you read this article and completely missed what the doctor was actually saying, so you immediately judged her ( and anyone who agrees with her) as "defenders of paedophiles". Why are you so sure that paedophiles etc. are "making a choice" to be what they are? [COLOR darkred]"We shouldn’t think about this problem only from a criminal justice perspective… Of course when someone has committed a lot of offenses and doesn’t ever intend to stop, we should punish them, but the criminal justice system is only meant to be a last resort, and we should keep it way,” she said. “Let’s stop with hate. Let’s stop with negative vibes in the media, and let’s stop with throwing rocks at offenders’ houses because it’s not going to take us anywhere,” van der Bruggen said. The gist of her speech was "Let's get to the bottom of why this happens and get rid of hatred and fear" Instead, you judged her words based on your lack of knowledge. BTW...that should be "We, as human beings, have choices...not "as a people".
| ||
|
Again... you ignore the crux of what is being said. All you want from your "blogs" is total agreement with your judgements. What makes you so sure that paeodophilea is just a choice people make? A question of behaviour. What if it's a genetic fault? Unless you are more knowledgeable than all of the medical and scientific professionals, you cannot with any honestly make that judgement. And, since you don't seem to know that neither vasectomies nor full castration do not work for paeodophiles... your suggestion for punishment is useless. There must be much more to the problem than just "bad behaviour control" The reason I mentioned priests etc. is because that has been THE MAIN THRUST of the news for many years now... maybe you think religious people can't possibly be so badly behaved? PAEDOPHILEA IS NOT JUST A MATTER OF "BEHAVIOUR".
| ||
|
Roy Moore is a paedophile and the author campaigned for him.......rather Ironic Did you go listen to the talk?......The whole thing?......This is what I'm trying to get across to you about critiquing your sources......about you just blatantly accepting the word of these dishonest people......this fake news. I'm talking about researching your sources before you pass it on.....It's irresponsible and damaging.....Look at these people here just accepting what they're fed.......and all of you reacting to it.....getting all worked up over a lie....... The psychologist works for the police in trying to prevent child sexual abuse. She doesn't think anyone should get away with hurting children at all. What she is saying is that there are a percentage of men who are sexually turned on by children and a certain percentage who act on it. She says that most people who have those desires are agonized by it. She says that they need help in order to not reach the stage where they act on it.....that the desire itself is so taboo that they are prevented from getting treatment. That's all she's saying......she is advocating for treatment....calling it a psychological condition that can be treated......She in no way advocates for offenders .......she is looking for inroads to treating the condition........all of which you would know if you took any responsibility for what you post........... That's what my comments are always about.......Take responsibility for what you post.
| ||
|
"Your reaction to the content of the blog makes me believe you support pedophiles". You are blaming Sparkle for your unfounded assumptions in a blog which you posted... without even trying to understand what the Doctor quoted in that blog was saying? No wonder you ignored her words, they didn't suit your intent. All you saw was "paedophile supporter" and that was enough for you.
| ||
|
The Roy Moore case has already been hashed and re-hashed in the media.....It certainly was never proven that Moore isn't a paedophile......There was lots of evidence, but, unfortunately, sexual crimes have a short statute of limitations. Apart from Moore, what do you have to say about the blog itself? Did you listen to the Ted talk?
| ||
|
"You have labeled him as a pedophile yet you defend Madeleine van der Bruggen, who argues pedophilia is a sexual orientation that people are born with." You have made two separate statements that have no relation to each other in a single sentence. How on earth could either of them "make you believe" you that Sparkle supports paedophiles? Why are you so sure paedophilia is not a condition people are born with? Do you think you know better than Dr. van der Bruggen and many other experts in her field? Why did you choose to attack her ideas as "supporting paedophiles"? Obviously you do not understand the difference between problem solving and "support". Your mind is an absolute quagmire!
|
×
×