Close Please enter your Username and Password


posts

Member Deleted Post


This post has been deleted by

MrsJoe 76F
17309 posts
10/2/2016 8:51 pm

I'll check back in the morning to see what your usual suspect detractors have to say to refute the truths you have put forth.
BTW, in Illinois to work in the healthcare field, even as a housekeeper or kitchen help, not only do you need a picture ID, they do a fingerprint background check. Any trip through the hospital or nursing homes in the city will verify that many of those nurses and other workers are black. Evidently, it is NOT to much of a strain for anyone to get IDs. It's just another one of the liberal, progressive, Democrat myths that they try to perpetrate to make others who believe in picture IDs, out to be racist.


Be a prism, spreading God's light and love, not a mirror reflecting the world's hatred.


MrsJoe 76F
17309 posts
10/2/2016 9:30 pm

    Quoting  :

I agree that we need reliable, honest people working with the ballots, but are there really any honest people in Washington, DC anymore? It seems we elect those whom we think are, and after a term or two in DC, they become just as corrupt as the others and only want to insure their re-election.
As for trying to suppress the vote, please explain how having a picture ID suppresses anyone? In our world today, it is needed for just about everything we do, so why not use it for voting also to insure ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE?


Be a prism, spreading God's light and love, not a mirror reflecting the world's hatred.


Katie_au_lait 78F
7026 posts
10/3/2016 12:05 am


Katie_au_lait 78F
7026 posts
10/3/2016 8:30 am

Nah...it's just boredom Maisie...you've been saying all the same things every day for...three years is it?

So instead of the endless boredom, I'll just have a nice bus trip to Dunfermline with my free bus pass. Paid for with contributions and taxes I paid for all the years bigblob thinks I was "sponging off the Queen".


bondjam33 70M
840 posts
10/3/2016 8:39 am

Once again I wish you would credit your sources when you plagiarise someone else's blog.

Al Fuller in historyhalf dit com might be somewhat miffed that you have lifted his blog from Feb 29th 2012 word for word - even the mistake he made about Al Franken whose election was in 2008 and not 2004 as stated.

I will follow suit and simply paste a comment (from crs52 - just so you know I am not plagiarising without credit) on Mr Fuller's blog

You have a pretty particular notion of what “facts” are, since what you are calling “facts” are cherry-picked or simply false. Either you did no real research before writing this article or you’re simply lying through your teeth. And it’s certainly presumptuous to call this “history” when you haven’t provided a shred of documentation to support your “facts” -probably because no legitimate documentation exists for it.

Just to set the attribution of fraud into a correct historical context I will quote Corey from the same comment section - who rather pithily summed up this blog in his last sentence.

It truly makes me laugh out loud when someone tries to say the Republican party of the Civil War era is the same as the Republican party of today even though they stood for everything opposite of today’s Republican party. All so they can say they are the party of Lincoln when they are nowhere close to it. The Civil War Republican party fought for civil rights for all. Higher taxes. Bigger government. And today’s party is aligned with hate groups like the KKK and Focus on the Family.

This article actually says “we are the actual perpetrators of all of this voter fraud but semantics allows us to blame it on them”.

Notice I have not used the term racist once. Neither have I included the terms gerrymandering of electoral districts nor made any reference to the process of making it more difficult to obtain ID in certain areas than others which might adversely affect one section of the population more than another section.


Katie_au_lait 78F
7026 posts
10/3/2016 8:47 am

    Quoting  :


Was that an ID so that you could get a concession ticket bigblock?
I have one of those too...handy aren't they? I get around a lot with mine.
Everybody in the UK over the age of 65 get's one... not from the Queen, from the Government. The National Insurance we pay all our working lives pays for it.
Oh...and it also pays for all our medical needs...so that we don't have to sponge off anybody...especially not the Queen...who, if anything, sponges off the taxpayers.

Shame you didn't know that...you wouldn't have embarrassed yourself by calling me a "sponger"

AND THEY SAY IGNORANCE IS BLISS!!!


Katie_au_lait 78F
7026 posts
10/3/2016 10:35 am


bondjam33 70M
840 posts
10/3/2016 12:38 pm

    Quoting  :

Now now. Name calling when you have been caught out?
Here is the original blog. I will leave others to decide if it looks a little bit like your piece lol.

Fortunately there is plenty of data to adduce. Democrat Party machines have been stuffing ballot boxes for at least sixteen decades. I’m not saying that Repubs. have never been guilty of election day crimes, but history shows that the Dems have been far more successful at it.

In New York City, for example, the Tammany Hall machine was rigging elections all the way back to the Boss Tweed era of the 1850’s. In the 1896 election, New York businessmen like Diamond Jim Brady had to keep their support for William McKinley secret, because they knew Tammany Hall would destroy anyone in the city who supported a Republican Presidential candidate.

In the aftermath of the Civil War, Southern Democrats used poll taxes, grandfather clauses, and other legal maneuvers (not to mention illegal maneuvers involving the Ku Klux Klan) to keep blacks from getting to the polls. Republicans fought back with the Fourteenth Amendment, which among other things makes race-based voting restrictions illegal.

For over half a century, Democrat Machine politics have dominated politics in Chicago. Mayor Richard Daley Sr. is widely credited with helping JFK win a razor-thin Presidential election by mobilizing thousands of dead and non-existant Chicago residents to vote Democrat, and things haven’t changed much since then. In 1982 the US Attorney in Chicago estimated that the party machine manufactured at least 100,000 extra votes in an attempt to defeat Republican gubernatorial candidate James Thompson. Sixty-three people were convicted of election fraud.

After the 1996 Congressional Elections Bob Dornan, a California Repub., lost his seat to a Dem. by only 984 votes. There is evidence to suggest that the number of votes cast by illegal aliens was greater than Dornan’s margin of defeat. Dornan could only conclusively prove that 547 of the votes had come from non-citizens, so the result was allowed to stand.

In 2004 Dem. Christine Gregoire won Washington’s gubernatorial race on a controversial re-count marked by various irregularities. Her defeated Repub. opponent was unable to prove in court that the irregularities had made the difference in the final count.

Also in 2004, Dem Al Franken won a Senate seat in Minnesota on an equally controversial re-count in which twenty-five different pro-Franken precincts mysteriously produced more ballots than registered voters. All the extra ballots counted in the final total.

Washington and Minnesota weren’t the only blue states with interesting vote-counting practices in 2004. In Wisconsin, Dem John Kerry won the state’s electoral votes and hoped that no one would notice that the ballots outnumbered the legal voters to the tune of more than 4,500 votes. The left wing group ACORN was heavily involved in the process. In Milwaukee, the police department conducted an investigation and reported that eighteen poll officials had felony records, and that eight of the eighteen had been sponsored by ACORN.


MrsJoe 76F
17309 posts
10/3/2016 5:23 pm

Oh, for goodness sakes.......... this is a blog, not a term paper!

Be a prism, spreading God's light and love, not a mirror reflecting the world's hatred.


GavinLS2 69M
1525 posts
10/5/2016 6:26 am

    Quoting  :

[SIZE 3]I think your being harsh to say Dems feel that "if they didn't cheat, there would be no Democrats in office."

But there's a valid justifiable reason they feel that way. U see, it's only because if they didn't cheat, there'd be no Democrats in office.

GBU,

Gavin


Rentier1

10/14/2016 8:07 am

    Quoting  :

I would pay cash dollars to see that.