Close Please enter your Username and Password


bondjam33 70M
881 posts
3/29/2022 7:22 am
In reply to Hank because he is a coward and a snowflake.


Hank's reply to the original reply to his posting is reproduced at the bottom of this post in comments for anyone who wishes to see what a pathetic excuse for a human being he really is.

Why is it that whenever I post researched, detailed and referenced material which thoroughly debunks the garbage you post that you can only delete it then crow about doing so? Why do you never try to produce detailed counter arguments?

You are like a pigeon playing chess - you have no idea what you are doing, strutting around with your chest puffed out and shitting on the board, then claiming that you won. That is essentially what deleting replies is.

Why do you perennially resort to childish insults? Did you ever graduate from kindergarten?

Your defiition of condescending seems to be talking in long words which you do not understand. Sorry, but not sorry. I am not going to dumb down responses just because posting intelligent discourse upsets you. Find yourself a safe space and hide away from the nasty man with the wider vocabulary lol.

Once more for the more discerning reader

What you posted is complete bunkum. If you took your information from reputable scientific sources then you would understand why it is complete bunkum. The Federalist and Epoch Times (who originally ran the opinion piece quoted) are not reliable sources and have zero scientific credibility.

CLAIM
COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is converted to DNA and enters the cell’s nucleus, so the vaccines can potentially change our DNA

Factually inaccurate:

The study didn’t show reverse-transcribed DNA entering the nucleus. It also didn’t show that the DNA was integrated into the cell’s genome.
Unsupported:

The experimental system used in the Lund University study is artificial. For example, it used liver cancer cells growing in the laboratory, which aren’t representative of healthy cells or a human being, to study whether the vaccine mRNA was reverse-transcribed. The study’s results therefore cannot be extrapolated to people.

The claim that the study showed that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines change our DNA or enter the nucleus is inaccurate and fails to understand the study’s findings.

The nucleus is where an organism’s DNA is stored.

Viral RNA could in theory be reverse-transcribed into DNA in the presence of reverse transcriptase activity from LINE-1. LINE-1 was found to be predominantly present in the cytoplasm of the cell, and this is the case even in the absence of the vaccine. NOTE - in the cytoplasm NOT the nucleus.

The study didn’t show that reverse-transcribed DNA entered the nucleus; its experimental system is artificial and not representative of normal cells

More importantly, the study never showed that the reverse-transcribed DNA integrated into the cell’s genome.

The news reporting that is covering this particular study is greatly misleading and I would also state that there are a number of claims the study made that are not supported by the study itself.

AND HERE IS THE SCIENTIFIC CLINCHER.

It is also important to note that this study was based on a previous report by ZHANG et al. published in May 2021 in the journal PNAS, in which scientists reported that SARS-CoV-2-infected cells carried DNA copies of the virus’ genetic material. Zhang et al. further reported that the presence of these DNA copies in the genome of the cells was enabled thanks to the action of a transposable element named LINE-1, which is present in human DNA. Transposable elements, discovered by the geneticist Barbara McClintock, are also known as “jumping genes” because of their ability to move from one place to another in the genome.

ZHANG's results have not been able to be reproduced by other researchers. The gold standard in ALL Science is that results must be reproducible. These results are not and so they are not credible.

Delete away if you like Hank but it will still remain that you are posting misinformation and slanted propaganda and it will still remain that what you are doing is dangerous to others as evidenced by the past and continuing high death rate in the US exacerbated by GOP politicians telling lies to their supporters.

bondjam33 70M
840 posts
3/29/2022 7:22 am

QUOTING HANK - (in all caps as he posted it)

BOND I AM HAPPY U CONTINUE TO SUPPORT MY WELL-RESEARCHED BOGS.

FEEL FREE ANY TIME TO VISIT AGIN, NEXT TIEM TRY HARD TO BE MORE COHERENT AND LESS CONDESCENDING. ARE A CLASSIC CASE OF BEING A NARCISSIST. YOUR FEEBLE ATTEMPT TO TALK DOWN TO OTHER SHOW A TRUE LACK OF EMPATHY.. OH, I MIGHT ADD U DO SHOW GREAT CONCERN FOR UR FAT WIFE BY KEEPING HER WELL FED,

WHAT IS THE SELLING WEIGHT OF PPIGS IN THE UK NOW.

OH YES, IF U TOOK THE CLOT SHOT AND HAVE HAD NO SIDE AFFECT<, FOR NOW, < THEN YOUR RAMBLING DIATRIBE WAS A WASTE OF UR TIEM AN MY TIME DELETING IT

I LOOK FORWARD TO FUTURES INTERACTIONS


Archer62 83F
7096 posts
3/29/2022 8:45 am

BOND, some folks just plain have never been taught to form their own opinions and do not have sufficient education to do so. Nothing you can say or do will change their opinions so whjy even bother? One thing I do know though, from personal experience, I will refuse a 4th dose of any RNAmessanger vaccine after the unpleasantness I have had with them.


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1702 posts
3/29/2022 9:58 am

bond please put on my blog what reliable sources are, the federalist and epoch are not reliable sources. why?? because they are right-leaning maybe. post your sources so all can see the names and decide if they are more reliable

the thing is, if u have had no after effect why get ur panties in a wad.

i post what i find is factual information. seem u r unable to hear opposing views which is normal for liberals

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL


bondjam33 70M
840 posts
3/29/2022 10:41 am

    Quoting CRAZYHORSE230:
    bond please put on my blog what reliable sources are, the federalist and epoch are not reliable sources. why?? because they are right-leaning maybe. post your sources so all can see the names and decide if they are more reliable

    the thing is, if u have had no after effect why get ur panties in a wad.

    i post what i find is factual information. seem u r unable to hear opposing views which is normal for liberals
The Epoch Times is a far right cult newspaper owned by the Falun Gong religious movement and described by the NYT as "global-scale misinformation machine". Interestingly it's symbol is a circle of 4 swastikas interspersed with yin/yang symbols around a central swastika.

The federalist is rated far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

On March 26th, 2020, Twitter locked the Federalist site’s account for violating its rules against spreading misinformation about the coronavirus.

By my reckoning failing fact checks, being banned for spreading misinformation and being a propaganda organ for a far right wing cult makes sources unreliable.

I am not the one deleting responses because they are 'unable to hear opposing views'. That would be you.

My sources are
1. the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the official journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal and an "authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans the biological, physical, and social sciences. The journal is global in scope and submission is open to all
researchers worldwide."

2. healthfeedback.com - a non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to science education. Our reviews are crowdsourced directly from a community of scientists with relevant expertise.

3. Reuters Fact Check (MARCH 23, 2022) - Swedish study did not find that Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine permanently alters human DNA (BTW Reuters is probably the most respected media source in the world and one I use every time I wish to fact check anything. Try it some time it might illuminate your thinking).


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1702 posts
3/29/2022 11:35 am

hahahahaha typical liberal talking ints. so your sources are more factual than mine. only cuz u deem them right-leaning and failed to follow the left's failure to see facts. the sourced u sites are all leftist. Reuters is like yahoo. so liberal mao would hate them

why should i or anyone feel cuZ federalist epoch, just the news ,, gateway pundit or RedState,, r far right. that they cant be a credible source for news.

oh wait, i am sure you salivate reading "facts" off CNN, NYT, msnbc, Bbc, yahoo, dailybeaSts, or the hill.

all farrier far-leftist that will never admit trump won in 2020. i hope have read hunter's Biden laptop has t been deemed credible by wait for it, THE NYT.

JOE, JAMES N HUNTER IS SHOWN TAKING PAYMENT FROM CHINA.

BOND YOU ARE A WISE MAN. BUT U LACK THE ABILITY TO CRAWL FROM UNDER THE LIBERAL BLANKET THAN HAS KEPT U WARM FORDECADES

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL


sparkleflit 76F
10271 posts
3/29/2022 12:44 pm

The Hank character is obviously mentally ill.....The historic lack of access to Mental Health facilities in the USA has led to the inability of the uneducated, low income population to recognize mental illness in themselves and/or others....Trump used it to his advantage, He gave legitimacy to their insanity and encouraged it for his own devious lust for power ....Crazyhorse swallowed it and is regurgitating it for his own demented reasons...Nothing we say will make a dent in his insanity...


CarolinaPanther9 62F
393 posts
3/29/2022 12:49 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    The Hank character is obviously mentally ill.....The historic lack of access to Mental Health facilities in the USA has led to the inability of the uneducated, low income population to recognize mental illness in themselves and/or others....Trump used it to his advantage, He gave legitimacy to their insanity and encouraged it for his own devious lust for power ....Crazyhorse swallowed it and is regurgitating it for his own demented reasons...Nothing we say will make a dent in his insanity...


Rocketship 80F
18580 posts
3/29/2022 1:50 pm

Well said Bondjam~~~~


bondjam33 70M
840 posts
3/29/2022 2:03 pm

    Quoting CRAZYHORSE230:
    hahahahaha typical liberal talking ints. so your sources are more factual than mine. only cuz u deem them right-leaning and failed to follow the left's failure to see facts. the sourced u sites are all leftist. Reuters is like yahoo. so liberal mao would hate them

    why should i or anyone feel cuZ federalist epoch, just the news ,, gateway pundit or RedState,, r far right. that they cant be a credible source for news.

    oh wait, i am sure you salivate reading "facts" off CNN, NYT, msnbc, Bbc, yahoo, dailybeaSts, or the hill.

    all farrier far-leftist that will never admit trump won in 2020. i hope have read hunter's Biden laptop has t been deemed credible by wait for it, THE NYT.

    JOE, JAMES N HUNTER IS SHOWN TAKING PAYMENT FROM CHINA.

    BOND YOU ARE A WISE MAN. BUT U LACK THE ABILITY TO CRAWL FROM UNDER THE LIBERAL BLANKET THAN HAS KEPT U WARM FORDECADES
This is such arrant nonsense it is not worthy of a reply. Calling Reuters and peer reviewed Scientific journals left wing is so far out of touch with reality that it is impossible to address with a anything other than ridicule.
Carrying on a meaningful discourse relies on the two parties existing in the same reality. You are deluded to the extent that such discourse is impossible.
Scientists put forward FACTS for testing and evaluation. You put forward crank conspiracy theories which defy the factual evidence.

Isaac Asimov expressed this succinctly and described the situation we find ourselves in with you.

“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge'.”


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1702 posts
3/29/2022 3:01 pm

    Quoting bondjam33:
    This is such arrant nonsense it is not worthy of a reply. Calling Reuters and peer reviewed Scientific journals left wing is so far out of touch with reality that it is impossible to address with a anything other than ridicule.
    Carrying on a meaningful discourse relies on the two parties existing in the same reality. You are deluded to the extent that such discourse is impossible.
    Scientists put forward FACTS for testing and evaluation. You put forward crank conspiracy theories which defy the factual evidence.

    Isaac Asimov expressed this succinctly and described the situation we find ourselves in with you.

    “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge'.”
bond u are accusing me of same thing that you do. you must be a horrible person to live with. you always have to be right. IF IT HELPS U FEEL GOOD. I WILL NOT DIGNIFY YOUR SLANTED VIEWS ANY LONGER. YOU ARE BEYOND ABLE TO HAVE A DISCUSSION. YOU WANT ONLY TO PREACH, GOOD LUCK AND I HOPE ONE DAY U CAN RELEASED HWO MESSED UP UR

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL


brightsmile4you 80F

3/29/2022 3:43 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    The Hank character is obviously mentally ill.....The historic lack of access to Mental Health facilities in the USA has led to the inability of the uneducated, low income population to recognize mental illness in themselves and/or others....Trump used it to his advantage, He gave legitimacy to their insanity and encouraged it for his own devious lust for power ....Crazyhorse swallowed it and is regurgitating it for his own demented reasons...Nothing we say will make a dent in his insanity...
Sparkle i agree with you and sad to say but there are a lot of folk like that.

Creative Ideas.


bondjam33 70M
840 posts
3/30/2022 1:23 am

    Quoting CRAZYHORSE230:
    bond u are accusing me of same thing that you do. you must be a horrible person to live with. you always have to be right. IF IT HELPS U FEEL GOOD. I WILL NOT DIGNIFY YOUR SLANTED VIEWS ANY LONGER. YOU ARE BEYOND ABLE TO HAVE A DISCUSSION. YOU WANT ONLY TO PREACH, GOOD LUCK AND I HOPE ONE DAY U CAN RELEASED HWO MESSED UP UR
I am accusing you of posting crank conspiracy theory posts which fly in the face of the FACTS.
I NEVER post anything which I have not fact checked and I NEVER post anything with a Scientific basis unless I can verify the Science and can explain it sufficiently clearly to make sure I understand it.
I have spent a lifetime living by the principle that if I could not explain something in simple enough terms for the vast majority of the students in my classes to understand them then it was not their fault but it was likely that I needed to learn more about the topic so that I understood it more thoroughly and could express it more clearly. In the end, however,even the best teacher has to accept that there are always some who will refuse to understand because they are willfully ignorant.

I am a teacher, not a preacher, and I have a mission to disseminate information and aid understanding. That is why I passionately oppose misinformation and will always call out disinformation.


TwilightSpirit 56F
1248 posts
3/30/2022 4:05 pm

Well said.


Shartaun03 81F
6200 posts
3/31/2022 1:15 am

Bondjam thanks for your blog. I thought Hank aka Crazyhorse had disappeared. I banned a blog in one of his names but then he pops up again like a bad penny in an equally stupid name. You will never get through to him as he is denser than dense. He is another lunatic like Trump. He takes up space on the front page with all of his stupid blogs.


Maudie1 74F
8151 posts
3/31/2022 7:59 am

    Quoting bondjam33:
    I am accusing you of posting crank conspiracy theory posts which fly in the face of the FACTS.
    I NEVER post anything which I have not fact checked and I NEVER post anything with a Scientific basis unless I can verify the Science and can explain it sufficiently clearly to make sure I understand it.
    I have spent a lifetime living by the principle that if I could not explain something in simple enough terms for the vast majority of the students in my classes to understand them then it was not their fault but it was likely that I needed to learn more about the topic so that I understood it more thoroughly and could express it more clearly. In the end, however,even the best teacher has to accept that there are always some who will refuse to understand because they are willfully ignorant.

    I am a teacher, not a preacher, and I have a mission to disseminate information and aid understanding. That is why I passionately oppose misinformation and will always call out disinformation.
Well said, Bondjam.


Koffla 68M
12289 posts
4/1/2022 1:50 am


Very well said mi amigo!





NBA PLAYOFFS
New York Knicks vs Indiana Pacers

.