Close Please enter your Username and Password


Fossil_Fetcher 71M
3672 posts
1/27/2019 9:42 am
🔸🔷🔶 The Real America 🔶🔷🔸

This post is only viewable by YoungAtHeart members.
Join YoungAtHeart now!

Non ego te hic placere


Fossil_Fetcher 71M
9612 posts
1/27/2019 9:44 am





Non ego te hic placere


MrsJoe 72F
11462 posts
1/27/2019 9:52 am

I've heard some liberals try to defend this action by saying it is only to save the life of the mother.......... but at that stage of a pregnancy, why do an abortion that kills the baby? At that point of the pregnancy, induction or a C section would save BOTH lives. Why does the baby have to die?

If you expect nothing from anyone, you won't be disappointed, but you might be pleasantly surprised.


Skariff2 66M
2901 posts
1/27/2019 11:57 am

    Quoting MrsJoe:
    I've heard some liberals try to defend this action by saying it is only to save the life of the mother.......... but at that stage of a pregnancy, why do an abortion that kills the baby? At that point of the pregnancy, induction or a C section would save BOTH lives. Why does the baby have to die?
There's more to it than saving the mother's life. Allowing the woman to have a choice in what happens to her body is one of them. More importantly, the good folks who profess to be anti- abortion are really anti-birthers. You see, once the child is born its fate is no longer an issue to the folks who originally wanted the baby born. Therefore, adoption and welfare become the means of support for the child and then we hear of the freeloaders living off the fat of the land by the same folks who wanted to bring the child into the world. I hope you see the dichotomy there. So, I think the pro-birthers should be posting methods of caring for the unaborted children rather than condemning those who favor a woman's choice. While I admire your fervor and dedication to a cause I also believe it's important to remember there are usually several issues to consider in any decision.

Prejudice cannot be conquered with logic, logic didn't instill it and logic cannot eradicate it.


bigblock46 73M
9540 posts
1/27/2019 12:03 pm

    Quoting Skariff2:
    There's more to it than saving the mother's life. Allowing the woman to have a choice in what happens to her body is one of them. More importantly, the good folks who profess to be anti- abortion are really anti-birthers. You see, once the child is born its fate is no longer an issue to the folks who originally wanted the baby born. Therefore, adoption and welfare become the means of support for the child and then we hear of the freeloaders living off the fat of the land by the same folks who wanted to bring the child into the world. I hope you see the dichotomy there. So, I think the pro-birthers should be posting methods of caring for the unaborted children rather than condemning those who favor a woman's choice. While I admire your fervor and dedication to a cause I also believe it's important to remember there are usually several issues to consider in any decision.
WE are all pro-choice, I wish the woman would have made her choice before she laid down and spread her legs.


bigblock46 73M
9540 posts
1/27/2019 1:28 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    This and many similar comments you have made on this site leads me to the conclusion that you actually believe that all that is required for a woman to become pregnant is to lay down and spread her legs.......
With out the act its its kinda hard to get pregnant. According to the NY Times incest or @e only account for less than 1% of all the abortions.


CarolinaPanthera 58F
3230 posts
1/27/2019 5:24 pm

    Quoting bigblock46:
    With out the act its its kinda hard to get pregnant. According to the NY Times incest or @e only account for less than 1% of all the abortions.
So, in order for yout 'theory' to work, all women of child bearing age would have to carry a pocket full of semen everywhere they go in case they want to 'lay down, and spread their legs.'


bigblock46 73M
9540 posts
1/27/2019 6:13 pm

Don't be so damn ignorant, You know exactly what I meant.


Rich1937 82M
6414 posts
1/27/2019 6:15 pm

There is no debate, abortion of a baby at birth is murder. People are sacrificing their babies to Molech. What you sow you will reap.

Every one is entitled to his own opinion. Facts are unalterable.


Maisie2013 68F
19152 posts
1/27/2019 7:07 pm

    Quoting Skariff2:
    There's more to it than saving the mother's life. Allowing the woman to have a choice in what happens to her body is one of them. More importantly, the good folks who profess to be anti- abortion are really anti-birthers. You see, once the child is born its fate is no longer an issue to the folks who originally wanted the baby born. Therefore, adoption and welfare become the means of support for the child and then we hear of the freeloaders living off the fat of the land by the same folks who wanted to bring the child into the world. I hope you see the dichotomy there. So, I think the pro-birthers should be posting methods of caring for the unaborted children rather than condemning those who favor a woman's choice. While I admire your fervor and dedication to a cause I also believe it's important to remember there are usually several issues to consider in any decision.
It's not a " choice". It is a living breathing human being who can survive on its own, outside the womb. Odd that the same people who are good with murdering babies are opposed to the death penalty, don't want a puppy mistreated, or a cow slaughtered for food.


Maisie2013 68F
19152 posts
1/27/2019 7:16 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    Many of those who are fervently against abortion are the same people who have no problem with children being separated from their parents/families at the border..........Like Mrs. Joe, whose response to has been "so what?" ....
Talk to the liberal Democrats about that one. There used to be family detention centers, keeping the entire family together while their asylum claim was adjudicated. It was liberal judge who decided you cannot keep children in a facility with adults who have been arrested from entering the country illegally.
In other words, in order to keep the family unit together, we can either put children in adult detention centers (unthinkable), put adults in child detention centers (unthinkable), or hold no one, which means “catch and release,” which means letting even more illegal immigrants loose to live in our country illegally.

If an American citizen breaks the law and is funneled into the justice system, he is separated from his family and children. This American citizen is not allowed to keep his family with him in a detention center.
Once again, our media want illegal aliens to enjoy special rights and privileges American citizens do not enjoy. Or maybe you would like to sentence the entire family for a crime a parent committed?


Maisie2013 68F
19152 posts
1/27/2019 7:24 pm

    Quoting sparkleflit:
    Many of those who are fervently against abortion are the same people who have no problem with children being separated from their parents/families at the border..........Like Mrs. Joe, whose response to has been "so what?" ....
Under Obama, when illegal border crossers were put into the criminal justice system, families were indeed separated. Neither Democrats nor the media cared about family separation then.


Rentier2 75M
478 posts
1/28/2019 4:47 am

    Quoting Rich1937:
    There is no debate, abortion of a baby at birth is murder. People are sacrificing their babies to Molech. What you sow you will reap.
Does that include fetuses resulting from s#xual assault or ince$t?

Some conservatives make exceptions for these cases.

I have never understood the logic of that.

It's not the fault of the fetus.
If every life is sacred, then these should be as well.


rus1940 79M
89 posts
2/11/2019 12:03 am

abortion should have never been a political problem. The government should never have a say in a person's life. I want to challenge the right to life folks. How are you going to take care of 150,000 unwanted children? Adoption costs to much and most couples could not pay the price,

RDD