| Blogs > Adolpho > My Blog |
|
Ranger's sweet words to the ladies and views on molestation Ranger seems to think that people here should accept him as a fine fellow. He seems to think that people, who have observed his words directed at women and on topics that he expounds on, mean absolutely nothing. According to Ranger, insults proffered to women and men do not count. Only his belief of what he thinks he is should be shared by all...his actual behavior be damned. The problem for Ranger is he has evidenced a continual barrage of abusive and insulting comments to women on this site. He has insulted my wife. He continually insults Maggie, Lulu, Carolina Panthers, ET, Bijou and any woman who rejects his ham handed advances. Let us examine his words from his latest blog (the blog with the intelligent title of ???? give or take a question mark or two) as an example of the way Ranger addresses others. His latest comment directed at women on this site is as follows: "Looks like the Harpy's Club has called another meeting. I see there still a few more skanks who haven't checked in. But King Dildo is there. All the man haters, one hermaphrodite, and one dyke to call someone else a woman hater. One dyke may be just a guess......there may be more." There is absolutely no excuse for Ranger to address any woman with those types of words. He began by calling women "skanks" Then he moved on to calling one woman a "dyke"; according to Ranger there may be more.. Then he went on to call someone a "hermaphrodite"...all words that would make any woman welcome his advances and beat him on the way to the bedroom. If this were the first instance of this type of abusive language it would be inexcusable. As it is this is not the first and probably will not be the last instance of Ranger unloading his bile on ladies on this site. So, I believe, on the basis of the evidence of Ranger's own words repeatedly expressed, that he has a problem that manifests itself as a broad based strong dislike bordering on hatred of women in general. To continue, this afternoon Ranger made the following comment about a young man who supposedly had been sexually abused by Michael Jackson. He, in typical insulting and abusive language, went on to say this about the "victim": " But to allow the creep to abuse you for seven years and keep your mouth shut about it, you must have been enjoying the ride, whatever it was." On its face this comment is disgusting at the very least. It is sickening to any normal person. What sort of "ride" was the young man supposedly enjoying? We are all adults who can clearly ascertain what Ranger meant when he said the young man "must have enjoyed the ride". Remember, if you will this was in a blog Ranger, himself posted and involved a purported sexually abusive relationship between a grown man and a young boy (at the time of the occurrence.). To continue, what sort of person would contend that the young boy, (at the time) would have had any choice in reporting this sexual abuse as Ranger contended in the subject matter of his blog? What sort of person would propose the possibility that a "supposed" victim of sexual abuse "enjoyed" the sexual abuse? Ranger seemed to realize that he had jumped across a line of decency in his commentary because he deleted comments on his blog. Yet he now takes umbrage at the fact that he was confronted with his attitude and his words. I contend that this whole matter...the volatile and insulting manner Ranger exhibits when a woman rejects his advances and the extremely odd manner in which he spoke of the sexual abuse of a young man is despicable at best. I stand by my observation of Ranger. I believe that I am not alone. |
|||
|
He got insulting with me and blocked me. Nothing Ranger does surprises me anymore, after I found out that was his usual behavior. Elaine Shuel
| ||
|
Ranger's behaviour on my blog was astonishing, to say the least. I didn't know him from Adam, and tried to give some benefit if doubt. And all he did then, was display many of the signs of an abusive personality. Blaming all but himself for his behaviour. It went far beyond just a dislike of women...and it shows that he feels that no-one has the right to disagree with him. It is very obvious that he feels superior especially to women. "How dare a woman disagree with him!" He makes it very clear (like some others in SFF) that he thinks female brains are inferior His behaviour since has been absolutely disgusting...I don't suffer fools or abusers gladly The man is so full of hatred he can't control himself.
| ||
9/16/2016 6:51 am |
Hi Don: This group has deteriorated into a hate fest with two distinct camps, left and right. I gave up long ago trying to reason with the right or trying to understand their views. I am interested in U.S. politics though so basically the only blogs I can relate to anymore are yours and Leafie's, and I'm so sorry you two have to endure so many insults just to write about topics that interest you. I really admire both of you for your strength. By the way, did you happen to see Nancy Pelosi's interview this morning on CNN? I really admire that woman and the way she was able to sum up what she has witnessed first hand in Congress the past 8 yrs. She described the obstruction the Repubs in Congress have planned, agreed to, and carried out all for the purpose of personally discrediting President Obama.
|
×
×