Close Please enter your Username and Password


jiminycricket1 73M
5404 posts
12/9/2019 1:24 pm
The double standard.


I know Democrats don't want get down and dirty..with Republican Congressmen..

As republican congressmen call Schiff and Pelosi names in regurgitating Trump.
That they character assassinate witnesses. As they ignore all evidence contrary their position..
As they fail admit..That if only factual witnesses make a difference.. Why they wish depose non factual witnesses, and do not wish depose the only factual witnesses available. That their obstruction of justice is the same as Trump's obstruction of justice.. the condone obstruction, because they do obstruction.

Democrats try maintain the high road.. Try not them in the shins when they do what they do.. Maybe Democrats are right, maybe getting down and dirty with Republican Congressmen doesn't get it done.

But all I can say....I can't take it anymore.. some Democrat needs stand up and Chew those SOBs out a new asshole. Call them names, accuse them of being treasonous, lying, self-serving, manipulating..
Never has a group ever been so tightly committed denying any truth being presented, denying any Presidential responsibility FOR ANYTHING.....by using lies and misinterpretations. For Character assassinations, and hoaxes and witch hunts.
Just like what the President does Democrats.. those Republican congressmen.. are simply no better than the President.. Somebody need OBJECT.. Object those assholes occupying a chair.

]

jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
12/9/2019 1:26 pm

As Democrats try to make an argument that COULD effect someone Republicans belief in what is the truth... the Republican don't make an argument that could effect what a democrat may believe to be the truth. The Republicans don't care, Republicans don't want any truth, The Republican stand on partisanship..... There was NEVER a choice, with this Congress and these Republican congressmen, for this impeachment NOT to be Partisan. It's what they want, it's what they can CONTROL


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
12/10/2019 12:17 pm

    Quoting  :

Bill Barr was interviewed..

And granted, he wasn't as offensive in his arguments as the Republican congressmen.

But in his arguments there was one glaring prejudice.. One clarifying argument.. that needs determination

The question one needs to ask Barr.. Is whether or not in regards to investigations, and accusations is the President held to higher standard than any other citizen.

Is the evidence needed to proceed with an investigation of normal person insufficient to investigate a president.
I think it's evident to me, that the investigation of Carter Page.. was sufficiently predicated.. No need for being a Trump associate, or a Steele Dossier.... Carter Paige was not primarily a part of something.. Cater Paige was a rogue agent..for sale to the highest bidder.
but the question posed by Barr is .. was that investigation sufficiently predicated if it involves Trump.

We must discuss Barr's point.. and Truth of it.. is Trump above the Law..at least to SOME extent more than anyone else?.... Barr obviously thinks so. Barr separates Trump from other people.
Granted there are SOME things about a President, that makes a president somewhat less vulnerable than normal person.. but those things are specific. To the welfare of the country.
Barr assumes. it's absolute, Barr assumes the the welfare of the President is ALWAYS going be... in the welfare of the country.

The idea that Trump can accuse the intelligence agencies of Treason, bias, false information, and a Deep State without any evidence.. Make him immune to the same accusations, with what Barr would consider, not any evidence , but insufficient evidence? Trump gets to do it with NO evidence. We can not do it with even SOME evidence

To go further with some others things I have said..
There is a fear that Trump is a would be king.. that Trump would make himself a Supreme Leader, That Trump admires autocrats.. and would like to make himself one.

This idea of WHAT could happen is frightening to people..
But to me.... it's means Nothing.

What could be or what would be.. doesn't matter....When the only thing that matters is what is. Does it matter that Trump wants to be a king, a supreme leader, or an autocrat?..
Those things are not what people ARE.. they are what people DO..
Trump already is a king, a Supreme Leader, and an autocrat...not because he has that title.. It's because that's what he does.

But that is the whole point about Barr.. Barr will NOt admit that Trump is a king, a Supreme leader , or an autocrat..
But Barr falls into Trumps trap.. he may NOT call him one...But he treats him like one.