Close Please enter your Username and Password


jiminycricket1 74M
5533 posts
11/23/2016 4:51 pm
Were the elections rigged?



So we got a new controversy. were polling machine hacked? There seems to be a discrepancy in every single precinct of Wisc, Mich, and Pa in which poling machine were used.
Trump polled seven percent higher in all of these precincts, than in precincts that did not have hackable machines.
that's the first indicator
The second indicator was the results for each of those precincts changed dramatically once Trump won Florida. It was, as if the machine did not start working, until Trump had a chance.

Yeah, we know, it's all a big lie??????????
The only way this election could have been rigged is if Trump lost.


jiminycricket1 74M
13732 posts
11/23/2016 8:49 pm

here we go again.


bijou624

11/23/2016 11:29 pm

Hi Jiminy: I was wondering if the electoral college voters use the same machines and other voting methods that the popular voters use? And just yesterday I heard on the news that all the votes are not even in yet, but why not? It's been a couple of weeks since the election and popular votes don't elect the president anyway.


jiminycricket1 74M
13732 posts
11/24/2016 5:48 am

    Quoting bijou624:
    Hi Jiminy: I was wondering if the electoral college voters use the same machines and other voting methods that the popular voters use? And just yesterday I heard on the news that all the votes are not even in yet, but why not? It's been a couple of weeks since the election and popular votes don't elect the president anyway.
.
All electoral college voters are just voter representatives

They way I understand it... There are three method to count your voter.

machine physical
machine electronic
hand count.

It seems they are talking about the machine electronic count, how the vote count appears off the norm from that particular count.
There is NO evident other than that of tampering, however many are requesting an investigation as to why that vote count is off, and could it be a result of electronic tampering?


jiminycricket1 74M
13732 posts
11/24/2016 5:59 am

    Quoting bijou624:
    Hi Jiminy: I was wondering if the electoral college voters use the same machines and other voting methods that the popular voters use? And just yesterday I heard on the news that all the votes are not even in yet, but why not? It's been a couple of weeks since the election and popular votes don't elect the president anyway.
All electoral college voters are just voter representatives

They way I understand it... There are three method to count your voter.

machine physical
machine electronic
hand count.

It seems they are talking about the machine electronic count, how the vote count appears off the norm from that particular count.
There is NO evidence other than that of tampering, however many are requesting an investigation as to why that vote count is off because a certain type of machine was used, and could it be a result of electronic tampering?


bijou624

11/24/2016 7:13 am

    Quoting jiminycricket1:
    .
    All electoral college voters are just voter representatives

    They way I understand it... There are three method to count your voter.

    machine physical
    machine electronic
    hand count.

    It seems they are talking about the machine electronic count, how the vote count appears off the norm from that particular count.
    There is NO evident other than that of tampering, however many are requesting an investigation as to why that vote count is off, and could it be a result of electronic tampering?
Hi J: Yes I know there are different voting methods in different places. But if Bob is correct and the electoral voters don't vote on the machines (in those three locations where the total votes are being questioned), then what would be the point in questioning the popular vote total? The popular vote totals don't seem to count when deciding who becomes president anyway?


jiminycricket1 74M
13732 posts
11/24/2016 8:15 am

    Quoting bijou624:
    Hi J: Yes I know there are different voting methods in different places. But if Bob is correct and the electoral voters don't vote on the machines (in those three locations where the total votes are being questioned), then what would be the point in questioning the popular vote total? The popular vote totals don't seem to count when deciding who becomes president anyway?
Forget the electoral for a second.

The popular vote determines the electoral college in each state. So in each state one can effect the outcome by effecting the popular vote.

It makes it easier to do fraud.
Once Trump won Florida. for him to win the election, popular vote fraud only needed to occur in Wisc, Mich and Pa. The change in vote to determine the election was a bout 30,000 in those states. a fraudulent 30,000 votes changed the results of the electoral college from those states, Change the election of 120 million popular votes, and determined the winner.

WE talk about it all the time....the key states, win the key states, win the election. It became clear with Gore/ Bush that a few thousand votes in the RIGHT state could change the election. So State election fraud becomes National election fraud.


jiminycricket1 74M
13732 posts
11/25/2016 5:51 am

    Quoting Fossil_Fetcher:
    AS I suspected, the same old sore losers are crying foul. You lost, back off of the hatred and move on.

    Fossil the Victorious

I'm not saying it was fraud......

I don't know.

But with all the hacking going on. it would nice to know, that our elections are safe from it.

You and other keep thinking about who won...I don't care.
In fact Trump winning was the best thing.

now we can stop the guessing rhetoric and move on to the real issues. find out what the guessing actually means
If Hillary had won nothing would have changed..
So now instead of you folks guessing the negative to the Liberal side.
we now get to find out what that guessing means about the positive to the conservative side.