| Blogs > willpak > My blog |
|
Is 23 Blogs in Three Days Excessive Posting ? |
|||
1/24/2008 10:22 am |
It's a little over the top. BUT, it's his perogative to post them if he wishes. YOU can only choose not to read them if you wish....
| ||
1/24/2008 11:06 am |
There is lottsa space , let him and everyone use as much as they want , why does it matter ? Forget the front page , as blogland grows , you will have to search ,use watched blogs ect ect ..
| ||
1/24/2008 11:12 am |
It is excessive and shows little consideration for others who are being pushed off the page. He could very well combine several into one without "clogging" as much.
| ||
1/24/2008 11:49 am |
Hi Will: Oops, I replied to his blog but I wasn't even aware of the clogging. I can't stand cloggers either, as they just seem so arrogant to me. Oh well, I personally think that one blog a day should be enough for anyone, but then again who am I to judge how much attention a person requires? Now when I go to the blogs I just click on "view all" and skim right past the clogs.
| ||
1/24/2008 12:15 pm |
If you don't like it, don't read it.
| ||
1/24/2008 2:03 pm |
If it really bothers you so much....get a hobby! Life...ya gotta love it!
| ||
1/24/2008 3:49 pm |
Nemo, One of my hobbies is railing against greedy, conceited and inconsiderate people who are vain enough to think that anyone would want to read eight or more submissions of their's every day, in the process, showing scant regard for other members' efforts by hastening their posts from the 'shop window' of page #1 where, in my opinion, the majority of readers spend what little time they have to spare when they visit Blogland. In my time at SFF, I have come across countless well written blogs by newcomers or otherwise little known bloggers, that received NO COMMENTS, on their blogs because their posts were submerged by a glut of entries by serial cloggers. Clearly you accord these people the right to clog away to their hearts' content, but you would deny me and many others the same right to express our distaste for the practice. It seems a little strange to me that cloggers dont appear to bother you, but those of us that are bothered by them do. Methinks maybe you're the one that needs a hobby to relieve you of some of the negativity you seem to be over-possessed of.
| ||
1/24/2008 9:13 pm |
Do you remember that woman from England with the handle of "fatsally" who thought she'd solve clogging with a fight fire with fire strategy, so she would post 50 blogs concurrently...and most of them contained one ridiculous sentence? I think I'll try it. lol!
| ||
1/24/2008 10:18 pm |
i don't understand how posting multiple blogs automatically deems you "greedy, inconsiderate and conceited.' conceited, to me, is anyone writing a blog who assumes what they have to say is soooo important, it needs to be posted where the most readers may glimpse it. in a world full of gut-wrenching injustice, railing against 'blog quantity' seems like a massive waste of time and effort.
| ||
1/25/2008 11:20 am |
DLW, If one was to take your line of reasoning to its logical conclusion - " in a world full of gut-wrenching injustice, railing against 'blog quantity' seems like a massive waste of time and effort" - there'd be little more to do each day than sit around discussing how we might manage to survive until tomorrow, to the exclusion of all diversion and recreation. I dont post many blogs, so I'm not overly concerned about attaining prime space for my own sparse submissions. What I do want to see is fair play for all bloggers, and I identify those that clog as being forbidding of that right to their fellow bloggers while securing it manifold for their own greedy and inconsiderate selves. I cant understand how any reasonable person would disagree with that.
| ||
1/27/2008 2:31 am |
Who cares, it's his life, his blog, his choice. Reading his posts is not compulsary.
| ||
1/27/2008 8:15 am |
Nemo, One of my hobbies is railing against greedy, conceited and inconsiderate people who are vain enough to think that anyone would want to read eight or more submissions of their's every day, in the process, showing scant regard for other members' efforts by hastening their posts from the 'shop window' of page #1 where, in my opinion, the majority of readers spend what little time they have to spare when they visit Blogland. In my time at SFF, I have come across countless well written blogs by newcomers or otherwise little known bloggers, that received NO COMMENTS, on their blogs because their posts were submerged by a glut of entries by serial cloggers. Clearly you accord these people the right to clog away to their hearts' content, but you would deny me and many others the same right to express our distaste for the practice. It seems a little strange to me that cloggers dont appear to bother you, but those of us that are bothered by them do. Methinks maybe you're the one that needs a hobby to relieve you of some of the negativity you seem to be over-possessed of.
| ||
1/27/2008 9:31 am |
Bikenski, I've also been long been aware of your predilection for negativity. I dont see that guy posting eight blogs a day anymore. How do you explain that ? Would you like me to remove your inaccurate observation from my blog ?
| ||
1/27/2008 9:33 am |
Were u appointed SFf police Will when I wasn't looking?lol Must agree a bit rude telling someone how many times to blog. Too many chiefs in SFF not enough warriors.
| ||
1/27/2008 10:33 am |
Nemo, One of my hobbies is railing against greedy, conceited and inconsiderate people who are vain enough to think that anyone would want to read eight or more submissions of their's every day, in the process, showing scant regard for other members' efforts by hastening their posts from the 'shop window' of page #1 where, in my opinion, the majority of readers spend what little time they have to spare when they visit Blogland. In my time at SFF, I have come across countless well written blogs by newcomers or otherwise little known bloggers, that received NO COMMENTS, on their blogs because their posts were submerged by a glut of entries by serial cloggers. Clearly you accord these people the right to clog away to their hearts' content, but you would deny me and many others the same right to express our distaste for the practice. It seems a little strange to me that cloggers dont appear to bother you, but those of us that are bothered by them do. Methinks maybe you're the one that needs a hobby to relieve you of some of the negativity you seem to be over-possessed of. I think I will start a new hobby in which I rail against fools that attack someone for doing someone they deem is so offensive that they waste an entire blog belittling people that defend the person under attack.!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for the laugh...your ranting and raving proves once again how some folks take all this way too seriously. btw, some may think that a clogger is someone that is arrogant...I think perhaps the person that is so quick to criticize another for something so trivial is the arrogant one!....JMO! Life...ya gotta love it!
| ||
1/27/2008 11:41 am |
Quoting alwaysnemo : " OMG...all this rage about someone who posts alot of blogs at one time...too funny!!!! I think I will start a new hobby in which I rail against fools that attack someone for doing someone they deem is so offensive that they waste an entire blog belittling people that defend the person under attack.!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for the laugh...your ranting and raving proves once again how some folks take all this way too seriously. btw, some may think that a clogger is someone that is arrogant...I think perhaps the person that is so quick to criticize another for something so trivial is the arrogant one!....JMO! " By the very act of clicking the post button for your response, you publically contradict virtually everything you say in it. You criticize me for doing no more than protesting against something I regard as unfair and inconsiderate. Why should that bother you ? How come you grant yourself the right to protest against my views on a matter that didn't directly concern you, and, according to the sentiments expressed in your post, something you shouldn't have wanted to get involved in. Your original comment on this post, "If it really bothers you so much....get a hobby!" was a pathetic attempt to be dismissive, belittling and insulting, but not something that was going to get by me without response. I've seen the same type of comment from you on numerous blogs in the past and I regard it as a cheap effort that's almost beneath contempt. Remember this madam, I dont need your permission to write about anything I want to on this site, any more than you need mine or anyone else's to spout your trademark snideness.
| ||
1/27/2008 2:13 pm |
Bikenski, I've also been long been aware of your predilection for negativity. I dont see that guy posting eight blogs a day anymore. How do you explain that ? Would you like me to remove your inaccurate observation from my blog ?
| ||
1/27/2008 2:19 pm |
Quoting alwaysnemo : " OMG...all this rage about someone who posts alot of blogs at one time...too funny!!!! I think I will start a new hobby in which I rail against fools that attack someone for doing someone they deem is so offensive that they waste an entire blog belittling people that defend the person under attack.!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for the laugh...your ranting and raving proves once again how some folks take all this way too seriously. btw, some may think that a clogger is someone that is arrogant...I think perhaps the person that is so quick to criticize another for something so trivial is the arrogant one!....JMO! " By the very act of clicking the post button for your response, you publically contradict virtually everything you say in it. You criticize me for doing no more than protesting against something I regard as unfair and inconsiderate. Why should that bother you ? How come you grant yourself the right to protest against my views on a matter that didn't directly concern you, and, according to the sentiments expressed in your post, something you shouldn't have wanted to get involved in. Your original comment on this post, "If it really bothers you so much....get a hobby!" was a pathetic attempt to be dismissive, belittling and insulting, but not something that was going to get by me without response. I've seen the same type of comment from you on numerous blogs in the past and I regard it as a cheap effort that's almost beneath contempt. Remember this madam, I dont need your permission to write about anything I want to on this site, any more than you need mine or anyone else's to spout your trademark snideness. Regardless of who you are,I'm bored with you now......bye now! Life...ya gotta love it!
| ||
1/27/2008 2:40 pm |
Quoting alwaysnemo : " Ah little Will...you remind me of someone else that seemed to always get his shorts in a bunch about this same subject....... Regardless of who you are,I'm bored with you now......bye now! " Typical of the bully, came in like a lion and went out like a lamb, when stood up to.
| ||
1/28/2008 1:36 pm |
Hey! I'm the resident "bully." And I'm gonna post 46 blogs in two days....just to make sure you don't forget it!
| ||
1/28/2008 2:41 pm |
FE, I thought you were too pre-occupied with clogging the comments to ever have time to bother with becoming a blog clogger.
| ||
1/28/2008 5:52 pm |
You mean..."becoming a blog bully?" I prefer to to exercise my atrocities consecutively...not concurrently. Which one would you like first? Bullying or clogging?
| ||
1/29/2008 2:42 pm |
You mean..."becoming a blog bully?" I prefer to to exercise my atrocities consecutively...not concurrently. Which one would you like first? Bullying or clogging? Life...ya gotta love it!
| ||
1/31/2008 9:19 pm |
FE,I'll make you a deal....I'll clog...you bully...at least when you bully it's funny!!!!
| ||
2/15/2008 4:35 pm |
poetroamer must have been removed by someone reporting him for abuse. He was a nice man and was interested in his poetry.As he was housebound he was probably filling in time and trying to make his day interesting. Shame on whoever reported him.
|
×
×