Close Please enter your Username and Password


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1760 posts
3/29/2022 7:06 pm
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson has a history of being lenient on p*rn offenders.


LOOKS LIKE SISTA JACKSON IS SOFT ON FREAKS THAT LIKE

NOT SHOCKING SHE IS A LIBERAL DEMOCRAT.

SHE IS CLEARLY DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR THE HIGH COURT OR ANY COURT. WITH THIS MINDSET!

BUT SHE ISA A BLACK FEMALE,, NO OTHER QUALIFICATIONS!!!!

A case in which Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson gave a light sentence to a p*rn offender was left off materials given to Republicans.

Questions are now being raised that this was omitted intentionally.

Republicans say the White House did not include in materials given to the Judiciary Committee a grisly p&rn case in which Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson departed significantly below probation office recommendation – and are raising questions of whether the White House “intentionally left it out,” which the White House disputes.

Jackson, President Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, sentenced the case less than a year ago as she was about to be elevated to the D.C. Circuit Court. Titled U.S. v. Cane, it involved “over 6,500 files depicting appearing to be of elementary, middle and high school ages, engaged in s*xual acts or posing s*xually.” The probation office recommended a sentence of 84 months in the case but Jackson sentenced the man to 60 months in prison, which was the mandatory minimum.

“Not does this case, which Judge Jackson left off her list of ab*se cases, undercut her argument that she followed the probation office’s recommended sentences, but it also underscores the perils of moving too quickly in the vetting process,” a Republican Judiciary Committee aide told Fox News.

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1720 posts
3/29/2022 7:11 pm

CONGRESS IS FULL OF FREAKS !!!

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1720 posts
3/30/2022 1:50 pm

HAHAHAAH REPUBLICAN SCUM. DUSTY I HAVE TO ADMIT, YOU R A CONSISTANT HATER OF REPUBLICANS AND TRUMP

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL


CRAZYHORSE230 78M
1720 posts
3/30/2022 2:08 pm

I READ THIS JUST TODAY. SISTA JACKSON. SEESM TO HAVE A WEAK SPOT, NO PUN HAHA FOR FREAKS

President Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson sentenced those in possession of child pornography to nearly 60 percent less time than the national average, according to documents from Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) reviewed by Breitbart News.

Furthermore, cases of child porn distribution in which Jackson was the presiding judge were sentenced 47 percent less than the national average. Jackson also sentenced the production of child porn 35 percent less than the national average.

In fact, in every single child pornography case she heard, Jackson sentenced the defendant below the sentencing guidelines, according to documents reviewed by Breitbart News. Similarly, in every single child pornography case, Jackson sentenced the defendant at or below the recommendation from the prosecutor. In all but one child pornography case, Jackson sentenced the defendant below or at the probation office’s recommendation.

Jackson has also been verbally sympathetic to those she has sentenced in recent years.

“[You’re] obviously aware of my policy disagreement. I just think it’s very, very hard to deal with number of images as a significant aggravator…” she said in relation to the 2019 case, United States v. Cane.

In the case United States v. Hawkins in 2013, Jackson explained a reason for giving a light sentence:

“I don’t feel that it is appropriate, necessarily, to increase the penalty on the basis of your use of a computer or the number of images or prepubescent victims as the Guidelines require because these circumstances exist in many cases, if not most, and don’t signal an especially heinous or egregious child pornography offense.”

During the case United States v. Cooper in 2019, Jackson told the defendant that adjustments must be made to the sentence because she disagrees with the congressional policy of the sentencing guidelines.

“I have long considered it appropriate to make some adjustments to the calculation as it relates to child pornography cases.”

“I’ve stated in similar cases, and I’ll say here again, that the guideline factors are in many ways outdated and, in general, they no longer adequately distinguish between more serious and less serious child pornography distribution offenses,” she continued. “I have decided to apply my general policy disagreement with respect to those two enhancements, at least that is the computers and the number of images.”

The Senate Judiciary Committee will reportedly vote on Jackson’s confirmation next week and as early as Monday.

THE DAYS WILL END ... TIME WILL BE ETERNAL